Companies pay out billions in settlements every year. Most people never file. Check if you qualify and claim what you're owed.
These claims close within 30 days. File before the deadline or you lose out.
471 claims found
vs. Vintage Wine Estates
The settlement resolves securities claims related to Vintage Wine Estates. Investors who bought eligible common stock during the specified period and meet the settlement’s loss requirements may file a claim.
vs. Northrop Grumman
Northrop Grumman agreed to a $75 million settlement concerning alleged soil contamination in the Canoga Park and Winnetka areas of California. Eligible current or former property owners and other qualifying residents may claim a payment.
vs. Spectrum Pharmaceuticals
The securities settlement resolves claims concerning alleged misleading statements or omissions related to Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. Investors who bought eligible Spectrum Pharmaceuticals securities during the court-defined class period and meet the notice’s requirements may submit a claim.
vs. FCA US LLC (Stellantis)
The settlement concerns alleged defects in certain Jeep 3.6L V6 valve-train parts. Owners or lessees covered by the settlement may seek reimbursement for qualifying repairs and receive an extended warranty, subject to the official terms.
vs. Crossroads Trading Co. Inc.
Crossroads Trading Co. agreed to settle claims from a data breach that allegedly exposed personal information. People who received notice about the incident may be eligible to file a claim for a cash payment and/or reimbursement of losses.
vs. HireVue
HireVue agreed to a $3.75 million Illinois biometric privacy settlement. Illinois residents who participated in covered video interviews may be eligible for a payment.
vs. Wanhua Chemical
The Wanhua portion of the MDI/TDI chemical antitrust settlements has a claim deadline of October 13, 2026. Eligible purchasers under the official settlement definition must submit a claim by that date.
vs. Doxim
Doxim agreed to resolve claims related to a data breach. People whose personal information was affected may be eligible for a pro-rata cash payment or reimbursement for documented losses, and the settlement information also describes credit monitoring.
vs. Flo Health, Inc.
People in the United States who used the Flo period-tracking app during the settlement period may qualify for a payment from the privacy settlement. The claim deadline is October 15, 2026; the fund is distributed among eligible claimants.
vs. Tift Regional Health System
A proposed $1.2 million settlement resolves claims arising from a data security incident involving Tift Regional Health System. Eligible individuals who received notice or were affected by the incident may claim reimbursement and other benefits.
vs. Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Investors who bought or otherwise acquired Eagle Pharmaceuticals securities during the period stated in the settlement notice may be eligible for a share of the settlement. A claim must be filed by October 16, 2026, and brokerage or transaction records are required.
vs. Globe Life
This data breach settlement covers people whose personal information may have been compromised in the Globe Life incident. Eligible class members can still submit claims before the deadline.
vs. Dow and Huntsman
The Dow and Huntsman portions of the MDI/TDI chemical antitrust settlements have a claim deadline of October 19, 2026. Purchasers who fit the official class definition may submit claims before that date.
vs. Concora Credit
Concora Credit agreed to a $9.38 million settlement over alleged Telephone Consumer Protection Act violations. Consumers who received qualifying calls or texts may be eligible; consult the administrator’s claim form for the exact class definition.
vs. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
State Farm agreed to settle allegations concerning unpaid fees on certain Louisiana total-loss auto claims. Eligible policyholders or claimants who submit a valid form may receive $28.39.
vs. American Income Life Insurance and Globe Life
American Income Life Insurance and Globe Life agreed to a $3.4 million settlement concerning a data breach. Eligible individuals may file for cash compensation or other settlement benefits.
vs. Concora Credit Inc.
Concora Credit agreed to settle claims alleging it made artificial or prerecorded-voice calls to noncustomers’ cell phones without required consent. People who received qualifying calls during the stated period and were not Concora accountholders may be eligible to claim.
vs. VSL#3 / Alfasigma USA
This settlement concerns consumers who bought VSL#3 probiotic products and were allegedly misled about the product. Eligible buyers can file claims for a cash payment based on their purchases.
vs. VSL#3
Consumers who purchased covered VSL#3 probiotic products may claim cash based on their purchases. The reported payment is $20 per bottle, up to $800, and claims may be filed online or postmarked by the deadline.
vs. VSL Pharmaceuticals
The settlement concerns claims about VSL#3 probiotic products. Eligible purchasers may claim a payment per unit, with a limited no-proof allowance and a larger documented-purchase allowance.
vs. Playstudios
The settlement relates to purchases in certain Playstudios mobile games. Eligible players in specified states can choose a cash payment or virtual currency benefit under the settlement’s terms.
vs. Lands’ End
The settlement concerns a data incident affecting personal information. People who received notice that their information was involved in the incident may qualify to claim a payment or other settlement benefits.
vs. Liberty Mutual
This settlement covers participants and beneficiaries of the Liberty Mutual 401(k) Plan. Current participants are paid automatically into plan accounts, while former participants may need to file a claim to receive their share.
vs. Lands' End, Inc.
People whose personal information was affected by the Lands' End data incident may qualify for cash benefits. The reported benefit includes a $60 cash option; claims must be submitted by October 22, 2026.
vs. Palomar Health
Palomar Health agreed to a $3.1 million settlement related to a data breach. Individuals whose personal information was involved may submit a claim for settlement benefits.
vs. Americold Logistics
Americold agreed to a $5.25 million settlement involving a data breach. Eligible individuals whose information was affected may submit a claim for settlement benefits.
vs. Palomar Health Medical Group
Palomar Health Medical Group reached a $3.1 million settlement over a data breach. People whose personal information was affected by the incident can seek settlement benefits if they meet the notice’s class definition.
vs. Lands’ End
The settlement concerns claims involving Lands’ End. Eligible class members may elect an alternate cash payment or seek reimbursement for documented out-of-pocket losses; the official notice should be checked for the precise purchase and claim criteria.
vs. Visa and Mastercard
A claimant group is being onboarded in relation to interchange fees, and a hard-stop cut-off date has been set for joining. Merchants or other affected businesses that have been invited to participate may still be able to sign up before the deadline.
vs. Equinox Holdings, Inc.
People whose information was involved in the Equinox data incident may be eligible for a cash payment or reimbursement of documented losses. The reported cash option is $100; claims are due October 23, 2026.
vs. Equinox
The settlement addresses a data breach involving information held by Equinox. People whose personal information was affected, as described in the settlement notice, may submit a claim for settlement benefits.
vs. Muscatine Power and Water
The settlement concerns a data breach affecting personal information held by Muscatine Power and Water. People whose information was impacted and who meet the official class definition may file a claim.
vs. FN Logistics
FN Logistics agreed to a $5.56 million wage-and-hour settlement. Qualifying current or former workers may receive payment; people who did not receive direct notice may need to submit a claim form.
vs. TED Foundation
The TED Foundation agreed to a $350,000 settlement under the Video Privacy Protection Act. Eligible users are generally people whose viewing information was allegedly disclosed through the covered TED service or site during the class period.
vs. Homebuyer antitrust defendants
Homebuyers who purchased residential real estate listed on an MLS may be eligible for a share of this antitrust settlement. The case concerns alleged overcharges tied to real-estate commissions.
vs. AMN Healthcare
The settlement concerns claims by eligible AMN Healthcare workers. Class members may receive a pro-rata share of the net settlement fund, subject to the official settlement’s work-period and job-category definitions.
vs. Homebuyer Antitrust Defendants
A reported $120 million antitrust settlement is open to qualifying homebuyers. The precise covered transaction and defendant criteria should be checked on the settlement site before filing.
vs. Fort Wayne Medical Education Program
People whose personal information was affected by the Fort Wayne Medical Education Program data breach may be eligible to claim cash benefits. The available report lists a $40 option or up to $5,500 for documented losses; confirm the official settlement portal and class definition before filing.
vs. On Q Financial LLC
On Q Financial resolved a data breach lawsuit involving allegedly exposed names and Social Security numbers. Class members who received notice can submit a claim for settlement benefits, including cash and possible reimbursement for documented losses.
vs. Pork industry defendants
This price-fixing settlement is open to consumers and other purchasers who paid inflated pork prices. Claim forms are still being accepted, so eligible buyers can file now.
vs. FinWise Bank
FinWise Bank agreed to a $2.8 million settlement in connection with a data incident. Eligible consumers can submit a claim online or by mail.
vs. FinWise Bank
FinWise Bank agreed to a $2.8 million settlement concerning a 2024 data exposure involving personal information. Eligible class members may claim documented losses or a pro rata cash payment and may receive credit monitoring.
vs. FinWise Bank
FinWise Bank agreed to a $2.8 million settlement arising from a data breach. Individuals affected by the incident may claim benefits; documentation may be needed for some loss-based reimbursement requests.
vs. TransUnion
Consumers who received certain TransUnion credit reports with bankruptcy remarks that did not match a public bankruptcy filing may qualify for payment. The settlement is open and the claim deadline is still in the future.
vs. UK Government / Infected Blood Support Schemes
Eligible estates may apply for the Infected Blood Interim Estates Payment Scheme. Applications for this specific interim estate payment route close on 30 October 2026.
vs. Bestway USA, Inc.
U.S. purchasers of qualifying Bestway above-ground pools may qualify for a payment under the settlement. The reported option is $40 without a receipt or 10% of the purchase price with qualifying proof, subject to the settlement terms.
vs. Law Commission of England and Wales
The Law Commission is accepting responses to an initial scoping questionnaire concerning consumer class actions until 30 October 2026. This is a policy consultation rather than an open group claim and does not provide compensation.
vs. Lloyd's of London Syndicate
A settlement involving a Lloyd's of London syndicate is accepting claims. People whose insurance matter falls within the settlement class can file online or submit a form by mail or email.
vs. Bestway
Bestway resolved claims involving qualifying above-ground pools. Consumers who bought a covered pool from a retailer may claim cash; online filing closes at 11:59:59 p.m. Central Time on the deadline.
vs. Johnson & Johnson
This group litigation order is managing a large set of claimants, with a staged deadline for claimant information and medical records. People already in the claimant group may still have pending steps to satisfy the court timetable, and there is still an open window for the second tranche under the GLO management order.
vs. LiveHealth Online (Amwell)
The settlement resolves claims that LiveHealth Online shared users’ health-related data with third parties without proper consent. People who used LiveHealth Online and meet the settlement’s class definition may file a claim; check the official notice for eligibility and payment details.
vs. TransUnion LLC
TransUnion agreed to an $8.31 million settlement concerning allegations involving bankruptcy-related credit reporting. People whose bankruptcy information was reported in the manner covered by the case may submit a claim before the deadline.
vs. LiveHealth Online
LiveHealth Online agreed to a $2 million privacy settlement. Eligible users covered by the settlement class can submit a claim before October 30, 2026.
vs. Amwell and LiveHealth Online
A $2.03 million settlement resolves claims that Amwell and LiveHealth Online shared health-related information through tracking technologies. Eligible users may file a claim for a payment.
vs. Johnson & Johnson
A Group Litigation Order made in June 2026 manages claims alleging harm associated with Johnson & Johnson products. The available update identifies 2,147 claimants and says remaining claimant information and medical records were due by 30 October 2026, so affected individuals may need to contact the claimant solicitors promptly to establish whether new claims can still be accepted.
vs. Denny’s
This settlement concerns alleged unpaid wages for eligible New York workers. Workers who meet the class definition may submit a claim form to receive a share of the settlement.
vs. Modernizing Medicine
Modernizing Medicine resolved claims tied to a 2025 cyber incident. People whose information was involved can submit a claim for cash and reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket losses before the deadline.
vs. ConnectOnCall
A $4.95 million settlement resolves claims related to a ConnectOnCall data breach. People whose information was involved in the incident may claim cash compensation and benefits described in the notice.
vs. BASF, Covestro, Dow, Huntsman, and Wanhua Chemical
Several settlements resolve antitrust claims involving chemical products. Purchasers of covered products may be eligible, with separate deadlines depending on which defendant’s settlement applies.
vs. BASF and Covestro
The BASF and Covestro portions of the MDI/TDI chemical antitrust settlements remain open through November 2, 2026. Eligible purchasers of covered products may file a claim under the applicable settlement.
vs. Southern Graphics, Inc.
People whose personal information was affected by the Southern Graphics cyberattack may qualify for a pro rata cash payment, reimbursement of documented losses, and credit monitoring. The reported reimbursement cap is $3,500; claims are due November 3, 2026.
vs. Furniture Mart USA
Furniture Mart USA reached a settlement over a data-security incident. Consumers whose personal information was affected by the incident may be eligible for benefits, subject to the claim form’s requirements.
vs. SitusAMC
SitusAMC settled a data-breach class action for $5.3 million. People affected by the incident can submit a claim by the listed deadline.
vs. Forbes Media
Forbes Media settled a website-tracking class action. Eligible visitors to the covered Forbes website may be able to claim from the settlement fund.
vs. Sandoz and Fougera
Sandoz and Fougera agreed to a $275 million antitrust settlement involving alleged generic-drug price fixing. Consumers and other end payers who indirectly purchased or paid for covered generic drugs may be eligible.
vs. Cronos Group Inc.
Cronos Group agreed to settle securities claims. Investors who made qualifying transactions during the court-defined period may file a proof of claim; payment depends on recognized losses and the settlement’s allocation formula.
vs. Peco Foods
The settlement resolves claims arising from a data breach involving Peco Foods. People whose personal information was affected and who meet the settlement definition may submit a claim for available benefits.
vs. Wellstar Health System
Wellstar Health System agreed to a $4.25 million settlement over alleged use of website tracking pixels that shared visitor information. Eligible patients or website users can submit a claim under the class definition.
vs. Wellstar Health System
Wellstar Health System settled claims concerning tracking-pixel data privacy practices. Eligible patients or portal users can seek benefits by filing a claim before the deadline.
vs. Communications Data Group, Inc.
People who received notice of the February 2025 cyberattack on Communications Data Group’s network, including certain customers of related telephone and wireless providers, may qualify. Reported benefits include $45 cash or up to $5,000 for documented losses, with credit monitoring available under the settlement terms.
vs. ZK Technology LLC
Illinois residents whose fingerprints were collected or stored by ZK Technology in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act may qualify for a payment. The reported estimate is $800–$2,000 per valid claim, subject to the fund, claim count, and settlement terms.
vs. Communications Data Group
The company agreed to resolve claims related to a data breach. People included in the settlement class may file a claim for a cash payment; check the official notice to confirm whether you received a settlement notice or otherwise meet the class definition.
vs. International Shoppes
International Shoppes agreed to settle claims after a data breach. Eligible individuals can submit an online or mailed claim for compensation.
vs. International Shoppes
International Shoppes agreed to a $500,000 settlement following a data breach. Individuals affected by the incident may seek available settlement benefits by submitting a timely claim.
vs. American Vision Partners
American Vision Partners agreed to resolve claims relating to a 2023 data breach that allegedly exposed patient information. Affected patients and others within the settlement class may submit claims for settlement benefits.
vs. Amazon
Prime subscribers charged excessive delivery fees despite membership promises. Group claim alleges breach of contract. UK Prime members can join.
vs. OneTouchPoint, Inc.
People whose personal information was involved in the OneTouchPoint data incident may be eligible for compensation. The reported maximum is up to $5,600, with the amount dependent on the type of claim and supporting documentation.
vs. Cuso Financial Services
Cuso Financial Services agreed to a $1.75 million settlement regarding a cybersecurity incident. Eligible affected individuals can submit claims before the November deadline.
vs. California Casualty
California Casualty settled a data-breach case. Eligible individuals may seek up to $4,000 for qualifying losses and credit-monitoring benefits.
vs. California Casualty Group
California Casualty Group agreed to resolve claims arising from a 2025 cyberattack. Eligible people may seek up to $4,000 for documented out-of-pocket losses connected to the incident, subject to the settlement terms.
vs. CUSO Financial Services, L.P.
People whose information was involved in the CUSO-related cybersecurity incident may qualify for reimbursement, a residual cash payment, and credit monitoring. California residents may also qualify for an additional statutory payment; eligibility and benefits depend on the settlement notice and documentation.
vs. Twist Bioscience
The securities settlement concerns alleged investor losses. People who purchased or otherwise acquired Twist Bioscience securities during the class period may be eligible, but transaction records are required to calculate a claim.
vs. Mental Health Association
The Mental Health Association data-incident settlement concerns a breach of personal information. Eligible affected individuals can submit a claim online or by mail.
vs. Holley Inc.
Holley and certain executives agreed to settle securities-fraud allegations. Investors who bought Holley securities during the covered period may file a claim, with payment determined by the settlement’s loss-allocation rules.
vs. Laboratory Services Cooperative
Laboratory Services Cooperative agreed to a $6.1 million settlement related to a data incident. Eligible affected people can submit a claim by November 24, 2026.
vs. Festival Fun Parks
Festival Fun Parks reached an $850,000 settlement over alleged processing fees at Raging Waters. Consumers who paid the covered fee may submit one signed claim online or by mail.
vs. Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies
This data breach settlement is open to people whose information may have been exposed in the Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies incident. Claims can still be filed before the late-November deadline.
vs. Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc.
People who received notice of the Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A. data incident may qualify for settlement benefits. The reported maximum is up to $2,500, subject to claim type and any documentation requirements.
vs. Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies
Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies agreed to settle claims arising from a data incident. People whose personal information was impacted may be eligible for settlement benefits if they timely file.
vs. WellNow Urgent Care, P.C.
Certain hourly, non-exempt employees with direct patient-care duties who worked at corporate-owned WellNow locations during the covered periods in Illinois, New York, or Pennsylvania may qualify for a share of the wage-and-hour settlement. A claim form must be returned by November 25, 2026.
vs. CPAP Medical Supplies
The settlement resolves claims relating to a medical-data incident. Eligible people whose information was affected may seek reimbursement for documented losses; the cited settlement information says there is no flat cash payment without receipts.
vs. Dr. Squatch, LLC
Consumers who bought qualifying Dr. Squatch products advertised as “natural” during the settlement period may qualify for a product-based payment. The reported benefit is $0.50 per product, up to $12.50; check the official notice for covered products and purchase dates.
vs. Dr. Squatch
The settlement resolves claims alleging that Dr. Squatch products were marketed as natural in a misleading way. Consumers who bought covered products during the period described in the settlement notice may submit a claim.
vs. Finastra
Finastra agreed to a settlement over a data breach. People included in the settlement class may submit a claim for benefits; the available report confirms the deadline but does not provide the official claims-portal URL.
vs. Dr. Squatch
Dr. Squatch agreed to a $9 million settlement over alleged false advertising of its personal-care products. Purchasers of covered products may claim; receipts are needed for the documented portion of a claim, while the administrator permits claims without a settlement ID.
vs. Dr. Squatch
Dr. Squatch agreed to a consumer settlement involving allegations about representations made for certain personal-care products. Eligible purchasers may file a claim, reportedly without proof of purchase.
vs. Equifax
Equifax agreed to a settlement over consumer-dispute practices. Consumers who meet the class definition may file for a share of the settlement fund.
vs. Navy Federal Credit Union
The settlement concerns unauthorized personal loans. Eligible members may receive cash and loan cancellation or repayment-related benefits, subject to the settlement terms.
vs. Hire Velocity LLC
Hire Velocity agreed to settle claims related to a data breach. People included in the settlement can submit a claim online or by mail before the deadline.
vs. Steel Warehouse
Steel Warehouse reached a settlement over a 2025 data breach. Affected individuals can still file claims for settlement benefits, including possible cash payments and identity-theft-related relief.
vs. Amazon
This settlement concerns allegations involving Amazon's return-policy practices. Eligible Amazon customers fall into one of the settlement subclasses; one subclass must submit a claim form to receive payment.
vs. GeoTek Inc.
GeoTek agreed to resolve claims connected with a cybersecurity incident. Affected people can file online, download a claim form, or request a paper form.
vs. Inotiv
Inotiv agreed to resolve claims stemming from a data breach. Class members may submit a claim online or by mail, and approved payments are expected after final approval and claim processing.
vs. Suffolk County
Suffolk County agreed to a settlement over allegedly unlawful red-light-camera administrative fees. People who paid qualifying fees between April 1, 2013 and 2023 may seek a cash refund; those without a notice ID can contact the administrator to verify their records.
vs. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
State Farm agreed to an $8.8 million settlement concerning Washington uninsured-motorist property-damage coverage. Eligible Washington policyholders or claimants can file a claim by the stated deadline.
vs. Educational Computer Systems, Inc.
People whose personal information may have been compromised in the Educational Computer Systems cyberattack between October 29, 2023 and February 12, 2024 may qualify. The reported benefit includes up to $5,000, depending on the claim and supporting documentation.
vs. Apple Inc.
Apple agreed to settle false-advertising claims related to iPhone artificial-intelligence representations. People who bought qualifying devices or services covered by the class definition can submit a claim.
vs. Kroger
Kroger reached a $17 million settlement over allegations involving prescription-pricing savings-club practices. Customers who made qualifying purchases may submit a claim; claims totaling $8,000 or more require documentation.
vs. Apple
Apple agreed to a $250 million settlement over allegations concerning marketing of artificial-intelligence features on certain iPhones. Eligible U.S. purchasers of covered models during the specified period may claim a payment.
vs. Apple Inc.
Apple agreed to a settlement concerning allegations about advertising of Siri capabilities on certain iPhones. Eligible US purchasers may file a claim for each qualifying device bought within the covered dates.
vs. Chimienti & Associates
The settlement concerns a data incident involving personal information held by Chimienti & Associates. Individuals whose information was affected, as described in the settlement notice, may submit a claim for benefits.
vs. Equifax Information Services LLC
Consumers who meet the settlement’s class definition for alleged credit-reporting errors may qualify to claim a payment. The reported claim deadline is December 28, 2026; review the official notice to confirm the covered reporting period and required claim details.
vs. Deere & Company
Deere agreed to a $99 million settlement in equipment-repair antitrust litigation. Owners or lessees of covered John Deere equipment may be eligible to claim, subject to the case’s product, ownership, and timing requirements.
vs. British Airways
Passengers affected by the 2018 data breach where personal and payment data was stolen from BA's website. A GLO was established to combine claims for compensation due to privacy violations. Affected UK customers can still join if they haven't already.
vs. Microsoft
UK consumers affected by Microsoft's 2024 data breach exposing email addresses and other personal data are part of an ongoing collective action in the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Victims can claim compensation for distress and identity theft risks. Claims remain open for those whose data was compromised.
vs. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company
Texas policyholders who received personal injury protection benefits and whose medical bills were paid late during the covered period may qualify for a share of the settlement. The claim deadline is January 19, 2027; eligibility depends on the policy and payment dates described in the notice.
vs. RealPage and related landlord/property defendants
Renters who paid rent at covered multifamily properties during the settlement period may qualify for a share of the settlement. The case alleges the use of revenue-management software affected rents.
vs. Progressive
The settlement concerns how Progressive calculated certain Colorado total-loss auto insurance claims. Colorado policyholders whose covered vehicles were declared a total loss during the settlement period may qualify to submit a claim.
vs. Visa and Mastercard
Visa and Mastercard agreed to a $167.5 million settlement involving alleged excessive fees charged at non-bank ATMs. People who paid qualifying ATM surcharges during the class period may claim a share.
vs. Hyundai and Kia
Owners or lessees of qualifying Hyundai or Kia vehicles may be eligible for reimbursement and a separate payment. The settlement resolves claims that certain vehicles contain defective airbag control units.
vs. Hyundai and Kia
Owners or lessees of certain Hyundai or Kia vehicles may be eligible for reimbursement and a separate payment tied to defective airbag control unit allegations. The claim deadline has not yet passed.
vs. Google
Android users' location data collected without proper consent (2016-2024). Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action for privacy damages. UK Android users eligible to join.
vs. Ticketmaster
UK music fans overcharged due to Ticketmaster's dynamic pricing practices during high-demand sales like Oasis reunion tickets are in a collective consumer claim. Prices surged artificially beyond face value. Consumers who bought affected tickets can join.
vs. Volkswagen Group
Continuation of dieselgate claims against VW for installing defeat devices that falsified emissions tests. UK owners of affected vehicles seek compensation for reduced vehicle value. Late joiners can still add claims to the GLO register.
vs. UK Government / Infected Blood Compensation Authority
People infected or affected by contaminated blood or blood products may apply under the Infected Blood Compensation Scheme. For most people diagnosed before 1 April 2025, applications remain open until 31 March 2031; later diagnoses generally have a six-year application period.
vs. Capital Health
Capital Health agreed to pay $4.5 million to resolve allegations it failed to protect consumers’ personal information in a 2023 data breach exposing Social Security numbers, clinical information, and email addresses. The lawsuit claimed inadequate cybersecurity measures. Affected individuals from the Nov. 11-26, 2023 breach may qualify.
vs. Pacific Life
Pacific Life agreed to pay $58.3 million to resolve allegations it sold indexed universal life insurance policies using misleading illustrations with inflated projections and undisclosed costs. Consumers who purchased these policies in California between 2016 and 2019 may qualify.
vs. GlaxoSmithKline
GlaxoSmithKline settlement over Boostrix vaccine issues. Recipients of the vaccine may qualify for payments with or without proof of vaccination.
vs. Stade de France organisers
UK fans disrupted by chaos and security failures at the 2022 Champions League final at Stade de France seek compensation. Affected ticket holders can still join this cross-border group action. Claims for distress, injury, and financial loss.
vs. McDonald's
UK franchisees and possibly consumers affected by McDonald's franchise model issues or food-related claims are grouped for compensation. Details involve operational failures impacting parties. Eligible claimants can opt-in.
vs. Alpine Ear, Nose & Throat
Individuals whose private information the Alpine ENT data breach potentially compromised may be eligible to claim from a class action settlement. The breach exposed personal information of affected individuals.
vs. Google
Black or Black+ Google employees in certain roles may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a $50 million class action settlement over racial discrimination allegations. The settlement is preliminarily approved.
vs. E-Benefit Solution
Individuals who received notice of the E-Benefit Solution data breach may be eligible to claim from a class action settlement. The breach impacted personal information of notified individuals.
vs. Mastercard and related defendants
The Merricks collective action has been settled, with at least £100 million earmarked for eligible UK consumers. Registration is expected to open later in 2026 for six months; as at 31 August 2026 the registration window had not yet opened, but consumers can monitor the official claims site.
vs. Gafoor
This is an open UK group litigation order listed by the Government’s official register. It is an opt-in High Court group action, so consumers or other affected people can only participate if they join the claim within the court-managed process.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This open group litigation concerns claims associated with diesel particulate filters and is listed on the official UK group litigation register. It is an opt-in proceeding, meaning people must actively join if their claim is covered.
vs. Glencore
Large-scale securities group action brought by hundreds of claimants against Glencore under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Liability trial scheduled for October 2026. This is a follow-on claim related to prior regulatory investigations.
vs. Rightmove PLC
£1 billion opt-out competition class action against Rightmove PLC, the UK's largest online property portal. Funded by Innsworth Capital. Consumers affected by alleged anti-competitive practices can claim without taking action.
vs. BHP Group (UK) Ltd
Multi-defendant consumer and environmental group action with major liability and quantum trials listed through 2026. Relates to environmental damage and consumer losses from BHP operations.
vs. Skyline Apartments
Former tenants may qualify for a cash payment if they lived at the property for at least one month during the covered years. The settlement is open for claims.
vs. AT&T
AT&T agreed to pay $177 million to resolve claims from two data breaches in March and July 2024 that compromised sensitive customer information. Account verification is required but no proof of loss is needed.
vs. Mastercard and related defendants
A related announcement confirms a nationwide publicity campaign and a six-month period for consumers to register after the distribution process is formally launched. No final claim deadline was available on 31 August 2026, so this is pending rather than an immediately fileable claim.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
Old Lyme Gourmet, maker of Deep River Snacks, settled false advertising claims for $4 million over non-GMO labeling on products containing GMOs. Consumers who purchased the snacks are eligible for payment. The packaging allegedly misled buyers about ingredients.
vs. Hillcrest Convalescent Center
People whose private information was exposed in the June 2024 breach may be eligible for compensation. The source describes the matter as open for claims.
vs. Advance Auto Parts
Consumers who received a data breach notification from Advance Auto Parts may be eligible for up to $5,100. The $10 million settlement addresses exposure of sensitive information like Social Security numbers.
vs. Multiple defendants
UK group litigation orders can also cover environmental damage and public nuisance claims, including pollution and chemical spill cases. Individuals who suffered harm or loss from the relevant incident may still be able to join if the action remains open.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This claim concerns alleged defects or failures involving diesel particulate filters in certain Jaguar Land Rover vehicles. Drivers or owners of affected vehicles may be able to join if they meet the claim criteria and the claim remains open.
vs. Parcelforce
This group claim concerns owner-drivers who say they were subject to unlawful working arrangements or misclassification. Those who worked under the relevant arrangements may still be able to join if the case remains open.
vs. Google Inc and related Google entities
The Competition Appeal Tribunal has published a certification judgment in the Google collective proceedings. The available results do not show a consumer filing deadline or an open claims form, so consumers should treat this as a live case to monitor, not as a confirmed claim window.
vs. Various U.S. chicken processors
Several chicken processors settled collusion claims to inflate raw chicken prices, expanding a prior settlement fund. Eligible purchasers of fresh or frozen raw chicken from listed processors in 24 states/DC from 2012-2019 can claim. No new claim needed if prior claim submitted.
vs. Wright Brothers Construction
Individuals who received a data breach notice from Wright Brothers Construction may claim up to $4,767 plus credit monitoring from a class action settlement resolving allegations of inadequate data security measures.
vs. Vivimed
Vivimed settled allegations over contamination in Losartan drug. Consumers who purchased the drug can claim cash payments.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC, South Staffs Water, and Cambridge Water
This claim concerns an alleged data breach affecting customers or former customers of the water companies named in the action. Affected consumers may still be able to join if the claim is open and they fit the eligibility criteria.
vs. Post Office Limited
Subpostmasters were wrongly prosecuted or financially ruined due to faults in the Horizon IT system between 1999 and 2015. This GLO manages claims from affected subpostmasters who issued proceedings against the Post Office. Consumers who were subpostmasters can join if they meet the criteria and the register is still open.
vs. Pawn America
Pawn America reached a $3.19M settlement over a customer data breach. Affected customers may claim up to $5,000 plus additional payments.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This group litigation order concerns alleged issues with diesel particulate filters in Jaguar Land Rover vehicles. Owners or lessees of affected vehicles may still be able to join if their claim fits the active group action criteria.
vs. Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd
Nigerian communities affected by oil spills in the Bille and Ogale areas brought claims against Shell for environmental damage and cleanup. The GLO manages these related claims in the UK courts. UK consumers or representatives who qualify can join ongoing proceedings.
vs. Volkswagen Group
Volkswagen installed defeat devices in diesel vehicles to cheat emissions tests, affecting UK consumers who purchased or leased impacted cars from 2009 onwards. This major GLO allows affected owners to join claims for compensation. Consumers can still join as the group action remains active.
vs. Lloyds Banking Group
Lloyds sold loan products that allowed investors to offset income tax, later ruled unlawful tax avoidance schemes. Affected investors can join the GLO for repayment claims. UK consumers who invested can still participate.
vs. Cathay Pacific Airways
Cathay Pacific suffered a data breach exposing personal data of 9.4 million passengers. Affected UK passengers can join the group claim for compensation due to privacy violations. The action remains open for eligible claimants.
vs. Microsoft Corporation
Microsoft email accounts were hacked, exposing data of UK customers including government officials. Victims can join the GLO seeking damages for the breach. Claims are ongoing for affected consumers.
vs. Rivian
People who applied for a job with Rivian in Washington State during the covered period may be entitled to a cash payment. The settlement concerns alleged failures to disclose salary ranges in job postings.
vs. Ticketmaster
Fans overpaid for Taylor Swift Eras Tour tickets due to hidden dynamic pricing practices in 2024. GLO launched to claim compensation for inflated prices. UK ticket buyers can still register to join the action.
vs. P&O Ferries
P&O sacked 800 seafarers without notice in 2022, replacing with cheaper agency workers. Affected UK workers can join claims for unfair dismissal. GLO remains active.
vs. Uber
Uber drivers claim worker rights including minimum wage and holiday pay after Supreme Court ruled they are workers not contractors. UK drivers can join the ongoing GLO. Claims still open.
vs. Flex-N-Gate / Ventra
Hourly production employees may qualify for a cash payment under this employment settlement. The source identifies the case as open for claims.
vs. Various U.S. chicken processors
Settlement expands fund for consumers who purchased raw chicken from listed processors in 24 states/DC between Jan 1, 2012 and July 31, 2019. Collusion to fix prices alleged.
vs. Booking Holdings Inc, Booking.com BV and Booking.com Limited
The Competition Appeal Tribunal published a summary of a collective proceedings claim form on 20 August 2026. The publication indicates a live collective action, but the available information does not establish a consumer registration deadline or claim form for individuals.
vs. Evenflo
Consumers who bought covered booster seats during the listed period may be eligible for compensation. The settlement resolves safety-related claims involving the product.
vs. Volvo
This is another reference to the Volvo emissions group litigation listed by the government as a current group litigation order. It remains relevant for consumers who owned or leased vehicles covered by the claim and may still be able to opt in.
vs. Comcast
Comcast reached a settlement over a data breach affecting customer information. The class action addresses the failure to protect consumer data. Individuals impacted by the breach may be eligible.
vs. Google
Google settled a class action over Android mobile device privacy issues. The lawsuit claimed privacy violations. Users of affected Android devices may qualify.
vs. Various U.S. chicken processors
Several chicken processors settled allegations of colluding to increase raw chicken prices. Purchasers of fresh or frozen raw chicken from qualifying processors in 24 states or DC between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2019, may be eligible; no new claim needed if prior claim submitted.
vs. StubHub
StubHub settled FTC claims over deceptive ticket pricing and mandatory fees. Consumers who bought tickets for U.S. events on May 12-14, 2025, may qualify for refunds. The settlement provides fee reimbursements.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
UK consumers who purchased Jaguar Land Rover vehicles affected by faulty Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) that failed to meet emissions standards are claiming compensation for reduced vehicle value and repair costs. The High Court granted a Group Litigation Order to manage these claims collectively. Claimants can still join via the group register managed by lead solicitors.
vs. South West Water
This environmental group claim concerns sewage pollution allegedly affecting rivers and local environments. People or businesses with a qualifying connection to the affected areas may still be able to join while the claim is open.
vs. Various heat network operators
Consumers overcharged or poorly served by district heat networks are claiming refunds and compensation. UK residents connected to affected networks can join. Addresses systemic failures in communal heating systems.
vs. ARAP/EGS
This group data protection claim relates to an alleged personal data breach affecting a defined set of individuals. UK consumers whose data was affected may still be able to join if they are within the impacted cohort and the claim remains open.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC, South Staffs Water, Cambridge Water
Customers of these water companies had data breached, exposing personal information and leading to compensation claims for misuse risks. The group litigation unites affected consumers. UK customers impacted can still register.
vs. The Gafoor Group
Consumers harmed by property or construction issues from The Gafoor Group developments are claiming damages through this GLO. It covers defective buildings or mis-selling to buyers. UK purchasers or residents can join the register.
vs. Post Office Ltd
This group action concerns allegations that the Post Office wrongly accused and prosecuted sub-postmasters because of faults in the Horizon IT system. It is listed as a group litigation order, and consumers/former postmasters who fit the listed criteria may still be able to join if they are within the court-managed group register and any joining window remains open.
vs. Absolute Dental Group
Consumers who received notice from Absolute Dental Group about a 2025 data breach may be eligible for compensation. The settlement addresses the data breach impacting affected individuals.
vs. NextEra Energy
Individuals who participated in the NextEra Energy 401(k) plan may qualify for a cash payment from a settlement over alleged ERISA violations. The class period runs through March 17, 2026.
vs. Mubi
Individuals for whom Mubi renewed a subscription in California between April 1, 2021, and May 31, 2025, may qualify due to deceptive pricing practices.
vs. Concentric
Individuals who applied for a job with Concentric in Washington state since Jan. 1, 2023, may qualify over labor law violations in hiring practices.
vs. Post Office Limited
Claims by subpostmasters or affected individuals against Post Office Limited, likely related to Horizon scandal or similar accounting issues. GLO manages all qualifying claims collectively. Eligible UK claimants can join by issuing claim form.[6]
vs. Vauxhall
This group litigation order concerns alleged unlawful emissions behavior in certain Vauxhall diesel vehicles. UK consumers who owned or leased affected vehicles may still be able to join if the claim register remains open.
vs. Various prospective defendants
Join the Claim maintains registration-of-interest pages for potential group actions. Registration of interest is not the same as joining issued proceedings or filing a compensation claim, so no payout or deadline should be assumed.
vs. Google LLC and Alphabet entities
The Competition Appeal Tribunal has approved a proposed £260 million settlement for eligible UK app developers alleging excessive Google Play commissions. The claim window was expected to open six to ten weeks after approval, with a four-month period; the exact filing deadline had not yet been published in the available source, so this is included as pending rather than confirmed open.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
Old Lyme Gourmet, maker of Deep River Snacks, agreed to pay to settle false advertising claims that packaging misled consumers into believing products were non-GMO despite containing GMOs.
vs. Multiple defendants
UK group litigation can include data breach and privacy claims, and open cases may still allow consumers to join on an opt-in basis. Eligibility depends on whether the individual was affected by the specific breach and whether the claim is still on the group register.
vs. Krispy Kreme
Krispy Kreme agreed to a $1.6 million settlement after a November 2024 data incident exposed customers' names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and financial account information. Class members can claim cash plus credit monitoring.
vs. Stor-a-File
This is a group claim arising from an alleged data breach involving Stor-a-File. Individuals whose personal information was affected may still be able to claim if they are included in the claimant group.
vs. Endue Software
Individuals whose data the February 2025 Endue Software incident impacted may be eligible to claim from a class action settlement. The incident compromised personal data of affected individuals.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
Old Lyme Gourmet, which makes snacks under the Deep River Snacks label, agreed to pay $4 million to settle allegations of false advertising. The case alleged product packaging misled consumers into believing the product was non-GMO when it contained genetically modified ingredients.
vs. Sony Interactive Entertainment
Collective proceedings in the Competition Appeal Tribunal alleging Sony overcharged for digital games and content on PlayStation platform due to anticompetitive practices. UK consumers who purchased digital games can join if certified. Application recently filed and open for participation.
vs. Gafoor Group
This is a High Court group litigation order listed by the UK government. The published register indicates the claim is active, and affected consumers or other eligible claimants may still be able to participate depending on the court's registration process.
vs. Unknown
This data protection group claim concerns an alleged breach affecting participants connected to ARAP/EGS. Consumers whose personal data was involved may still be able to join if the action remains open.
vs. Thames Water, Severn Trent Water, United Utilities Water, Anglian Water, Yorkshire Water and Northumbrian Water
Professor Carolyn Roberts is pursuing an opt-out Competition Appeal Tribunal claim alleging that major water companies under-reported pollution incidents, affecting regulatory allowances and customer prices. The Supreme Court granted permission to appeal, but the available information does not show that consumers can currently submit individual claims.
vs. Daimler, DAF, Iveco, MAN, Scania, and Volvo/Renault
This is a Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action over alleged truck cartel conduct and overcharges. The UK regime is opt-in for direct claims in these proceedings, so fleet purchasers and other eligible claimants may still be able to join if the case remains open.
vs. Various U.S. chicken processors
This settlement covers allegations that several chicken processors colluded to raise the price of raw chicken. Consumers who bought qualifying raw chicken in certain states during the class period may still file a claim.
vs. Various Crypto Exchanges
Multiple claims in CAT allege anticompetitive behaviour by cryptocurrency exchanges affecting UK consumers. Consumers who traded on these platforms during specified periods can potentially join certified proceedings. Among 25 current CAT cases awaiting certification.
vs. Post Office Limited
The Post Office Horizon GLO redress scheme covered former sub-postmasters and related claimants, but the government states that the scheme closed to new applications on 31 July 2026. It is therefore not currently open to new claimants on the requested date.
vs. Automotive manufacturers or related defendants
This group claim concerns vehicle emissions issues and related compensation for affected vehicle owners or lessees. Consumers who owned or used qualifying vehicles may still be able to join.
vs. Beacon CRM
A proposed group action invites people who may have been affected by the Beacon CRM data breach to register their interest. The available page describes a group action rather than a completed settlement and does not state a fixed deadline or payout.
vs. Unknown (Gafoor-related)
Group litigation order issued for claims involving Gafoor, likely related to consumer or property issues based on court listing. UK consumers affected by the common issues can apply to join the group register. Specific details on the nature of claims are listed in the High Court order.
vs. Various Card Networks
Collective proceedings in CAT over excessive merchant interchange fees passed on to UK consumers, increasing costs. Consumers who made card payments may be eligible to join pre-certification. One of 25 current CAT cases.
vs. Crimson Wine Group
Individuals whose personal data was exposed in the Crimson Wine Group data breach may claim up to $5,000 plus credit monitoring from a $637K class action settlement.
vs. Rivian
Applicants who applied for jobs in Washington State may be eligible for a cash payment from a settlement alleging Rivian failed to disclose salary ranges in job postings. The settlement is open for claims.
vs. Volvo
This open group litigation concerns alleged NOx emissions claims against Volvo and appears on the government’s current GLO register. Eligible claimants must opt in to take part.
vs. Nissan
This open GLO concerns alleged NOx emissions claims against Nissan and is listed on the official register. It is not an automatic class action; consumers must opt in to be covered.
vs. Hyundai
This open UK GLO relates to alleged Hyundai NOx emissions issues. It remains on the official register, meaning eligible people may still be able to join if they act within the court process.
vs. Apple Inc.
CAT collective action claiming anticompetitive practices related to Apple batteries, potentially affecting device performance and pricing for UK consumers. Open for consumers to join pending certification. Part of recent wave of tech competition claims.
vs. Various Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Multiple yet-to-be-certified collective proceedings in CAT against crypto exchanges for alleged anticompetitive behavior affecting UK consumers. Consumers who traded on these platforms during specified periods may qualify to join. Claims are at early stages and open.
vs. SAG-AFTRA Health Plan
This settlement resolves claims tied to a data breach involving the SAG-AFTRA Health Plan. Affected individuals may be eligible for reimbursement, a pro rata cash payment, and credit monitoring.
vs. Transamerica Life Insurance
$57M settlement for policyholders affected by universal life insurance rate increases since November 1, 2021. Eligible owners can receive minimum $200 payments.
vs. Post Office Limited
This High Court group litigation concerns sub-postmasters and others who say the Horizon IT system caused accounting discrepancies, wrongful accusations, or related losses. It is relevant to people who were eligible to join the original group register and to related redress processes, but the main GLO proceedings themselves are no longer an open joiner claim.
vs. Various Heat Network Operators
Consumers overcharged or misbilled by heat network operators for district heating services are claiming refunds and compensation. The group action targets systemic billing issues. UK residents affected can join the claim.
vs. Oldcastle APG West
Washington job applicants or workers may be eligible if they were affected by the alleged job posting violations covered by this settlement. The listing indicates claims are still open.
vs. UK government or related defence bodies
This is an active group claim concerning a data breach linked to ARAP / EGS. People affected by the incident may be able to join while the claim is still being pursued.
vs. FREENOW
This is a group claim involving drivers for FREENOW. Leigh Day lists it as active, and eligible drivers may still be able to join if they satisfy the case criteria.
vs. Flo
Users of the Flo app during the settlement class period may be eligible to claim cash from a privacy settlement. The claim process is open for qualifying users.
vs. Tuft & Needle
Consumers in California who bought certain discounted mattresses may be eligible for a payment from a settlement over pricing allegations. The claim is open for qualifying purchasers.
vs. Mazda
This open UK group litigation order covers Mazda NOx emissions claims listed on the official register. It is a collective opt-in action, so only joined claimants are included.
vs. BMW
This is an active UK group litigation order involving alleged BMW NOx emissions claims. The official register indicates the litigation is open, and claimants must join the group to participate.
vs. Volkswagen
This is an open group litigation order over alleged Volkswagen NOx emissions claims. It is a collective claim, but participation requires active opt-in rather than automatic inclusion.
vs. Bray International
People whose personal information was exposed in the Bray International data breach may be eligible to claim settlement benefits. The settlement is listed as currently open.
vs. Various agricultural and/or water-related defendants
This environmental group claim concerns pollution affecting the River Wye. Individuals or landowners with qualifying losses or impacts may still be able to join if the case remains open.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
This settlement resolves allegations that Deep River Snacks packaging falsely suggested the products were non-GMO. Consumers who bought qualifying products may be able to claim compensation.
vs. BCA
Drivers transporting vehicles for BCA (vehicle auction firm) claiming worker status entitlements like minimum wage and rest breaks. Group litigation for logistics drivers. Open to qualifying drivers.
vs. Lemonade
This settlement concerns a data breach involving Lemonade and is open to eligible consumers who were affected. Claimants may be able to obtain compensation if their information was involved.
vs. Peugeot
This open group litigation concerns alleged NOx emissions claims against Peugeot. The claim is managed as an opt-in group action, so claimants must take active steps to join.
vs. Renault
This active GLO concerns alleged Renault NOx emissions claims and is listed on the current UK register. Consumers can only participate by joining the group claim.
vs. Unknown
The settlement listing indicates claims are still open for people affected by the Oklahoma earthquakes case. Specific eligibility details are not provided in the search result.
vs. Google
The UK Google Play Store collective action alleges that Google abused a dominant position by charging excessive commissions on app and digital-content purchases. UK consumers and businesses who bought qualifying Google Play Store apps, in-app content or subscriptions are included in the certified opt-out proceedings unless they opted out by the earlier 2022 date; the claim remains active and is scheduled for trial in October 2026.
vs. Various Pet Food Manufacturers
Pet owners whose cats suffered illness or death from contaminated cat food are seeking damages for veterinary costs and loss. This collective action addresses product liability failures. Eligible UK pet owners can join.
vs. Lands' End
Consumers whose information was exposed in the 2024 Lands' End data breach may be eligible for cash compensation and credit monitoring. The settlement is currently open for claims.
vs. Amazon
This settlement concerns alleged meal and rest break violations affecting hourly employees in Washington state. Workers who meet the class definition may be eligible for payment.
vs. Vauxhall
This is an open UK group litigation order relating to alleged NOx emissions issues. The official register confirms it is active, and claimants must join the action to be included.
vs. Citroën
This is an open UK GLO for alleged NOx emissions claims involving Citroën vehicles. Because GLOs in England and Wales are opt-in, only registered claimants can pursue the claim collectively.
vs. Kia
This is an open group litigation order involving alleged NOx emissions claims against Kia. The action is still listed as current, and claimants must join to be included.
vs. Multiple defendants across open GLOs
This is the official court list of group litigation orders, which includes current GLOs and indicates which group cases exist in the UK system. Individual claimants can only join if their specific GLO remains open and their lawyers are still accepting new claimants.
vs. Thames Water, Severn Trent, United Utilities, Anglian Water, Yorkshire Water and Northumbrian Water
A collective competition claim alleges that six water companies under-reported pollution incidents and thereby overcharged customers. The case is subject to ongoing appellate proceedings, including a reported Supreme Court appeal; prospective claimants should verify current participation arrangements with the representative or solicitors because no consumer claims deadline was identified.
vs. Fidelity Investments
Fidelity Investments suffered a data breach that compromised customer personal and financial information. Affected customers can claim compensation from this $2.5M settlement.
vs. Berman & Rabin
Individuals whose personal data was exposed in the Berman & Rabin data breach may claim up to $3,500 plus credit monitoring from a $980,000 class action settlement.
vs. Teva Pharmaceuticals
Teva engaged in price-fixing for QVAR inhalers, artificially inflating prices for consumers. Individuals who purchased QVAR inhalers can claim compensation from this $35M settlement.
vs. Navistar / International Motors
People who paid a tobacco surcharge in the company health plan may qualify for a settlement payment. The claim period is open for eligible participants.
vs. Ford
This is an ongoing UK group litigation order concerning alleged Ford NOx emissions issues. The register shows it remains active, and claimants need to join rather than being included automatically.
vs. Mercedes-Benz
This open group litigation order covers claims alleging Mercedes NOx emissions issues. It is an opt-in claim, so affected consumers need to take action to join.
vs. Capital One
Eligible Capital One 360 Savings account holders may be able to claim money from this settlement. The listing says it is open and no proof is required.
vs. English National Ballet
A proposed data-protection compensation action is available for people whose personal information was involved in the English National Ballet data breach. Registration is presently described as open, but this is an investigation or group-action sign-up rather than a court-approved settlement with a fixed payout or deadline.
vs. Grubhub
Grubhub charged excessive delivery fees to California customers in violation of state law. California consumers who used Grubhub can claim compensation from this $5M settlement.
vs. Ryanair
Passengers denied full compensation for mass flight cancellations in 2022. GLO claims airlines failed EU261 obligations. Affected flyers can still join.
vs. Onsite Mammography
This settlement is for people whose personal data was allegedly compromised in a data breach involving Onsite Mammography. Eligible class members may be able to submit claims for compensation and related benefits.
vs. Uber
This group claim concerns Uber drivers and their employment or pay-related rights. Leigh Day lists it as active, indicating some drivers may still be able to join if they qualify.
vs. Walleys Quarry
This group claim concerns alleged nuisance or pollution connected with the landfill site. Leigh Day lists it as active, so people affected by odors or pollution may still be able to join.
vs. Berman & Rabin
Individuals whose data was compromised in the July 2024 Berman & Rabin data breach may claim up to $3,500 plus credit monitoring from a class action settlement resolving allegations of inadequate data security.
vs. British Airways Plc
This group litigation concerns claims arising from a data breach affecting British Airways customers. Claimants who were affected by the incident can still join if their claim has not yet been added to the group register and the action remains open.
vs. Metropolitan Police Federation / Operation Fortress-related defendants
The Operation Fortress data-breach action remains open for affected individuals to pursue or register claims, with the reported limitation period described as six years. The available update did not give a final group-joining deadline, so eligibility and the precise route to issue a claim should be confirmed directly with the legal representatives.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover (JLR)
Owners of Jaguar Land Rover vehicles claim that Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) were defective, causing excessive repair costs and reduced vehicle usability. The GLO was established in November 2024 to manage these claims collectively. UK consumers who purchased affected models can still join the group register.
vs. Boston Children’s Health Physicians
This settlement resolves claims tied to a 2024 data breach that reportedly affected hundreds of thousands of people. Eligible individuals may claim cash compensation and related benefits if their information was involved.
vs. Stor-a-File
This is an open group data breach claim. Affected individuals may still be able to join if their personal information was exposed in the incident.
vs. CR&R Environmental Services
Individuals who received a notice about the CR&R 2022 data breach may be eligible to claim up to $5,000 from a $500K class action settlement.
vs. HCRG Care Group
A potential UK group action concerns the HCRG Care Group cyber attack and possible exposure of personal information. Affected people can still seek an assessment, but the available information describes individual claim review rather than a confirmed settlement or formal open GLO with a specified deadline.
vs. Post Office Limited
Subpostmasters affected by the Horizon IT scandal continue to pursue claims through the GLO for wrongful convictions, financial losses, and reputational damage. The GLO covers all claims against Post Office Limited by affected claimants. Additional victims can still opt-in to the group register.
vs. UK Water Companies (Thames, United Utilities, etc.)
Claims against water companies for illegal sewage discharges affecting properties and health. GLO covers private nuisance and negligence claims. Affected households/businesses can opt-in.
vs. Multiple Banks
Ongoing GLO for PPI policies sold with loans/mortgages where time-barred individual claims can join group action. Covers single premium policies. Eligible consumers can still register.
vs. Mt. Baker Imaging
This settlement addresses a data breach affecting patients or other individuals whose information may have been exposed. Qualified class members can seek cash compensation, a pro rata payment, and data monitoring.
vs. Ministry of Defence
This is a group claim relating to a data breach connected with ARAP/EGS matters. Leigh Day lists it as an active group claim, indicating consumers or affected individuals may still be able to join if they meet the claimant criteria.
vs. Addison Lee
This group claim concerns driver status and related employment issues involving Addison Lee. Drivers who worked in the relevant period may be able to join while the case is open.
vs. Parcelforce
This is an open group claim for owner-drivers working with Parcelforce. Drivers who meet the relevant contractor or employment criteria may be able to join.
vs. Various river pollution defendants
This active group claim concerns environmental harm associated with pollution in the River Wye area. Leigh Day lists it as open, meaning affected residents or landowners may still be able to join.
vs. Multiple competition law defendants
The CAT allows collective proceedings for breaches of competition law, including opt-in and opt-out cases. Open CAT claims can still be joined or participated in if the tribunal has certified the class and the claim is still live.
vs. Robbie D. Wood Inc.
This settlement covers people whose information may have been exposed in the October 2024 Robbie D. Wood breach. Class members may be able to claim compensation if they were notified or otherwise affected.
vs. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
A $5.85 million settlement for drivers who had total loss auto claims with Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance. The suit alleged improper claim handling and valuation practices. Eligible policyholders receive pro rata cash payments.
vs. Google
Google agreed to pay $68 million to settle privacy claims related to Google Assistant recordings and data collection without proper consent. U.S. users of Google Assistant devices during the class period qualify. Payments vary based on usage.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet (Deep River Snacks)
$4 million settlement over false 'non-GMO' advertising on Deep River Snacks packaging that actually contained GMOs. Purchasers of affected products qualify for cash payments. Covers misleading labeling claims.
vs. Various U.S. Chicken Processors
Chicken processors settled collusion claims to artificially inflate raw chicken prices. Consumers who bought fresh or frozen raw chicken in 24 states/DC from Jan 1, 2012 to July 31, 2019 qualify. No new claim needed if prior claim submitted.
vs. Gafoor
This is a UK group litigation order listed by the courts, indicating a live multi-claim action managed together because the claims share common issues. Claimants may still be able to join if their claim falls within the registered group and the register remains open.
vs. Circle K
Circle K resolved claims stemming from a May 2024 data breach. Consumers who received notice may be able to claim compensation for documented out-of-pocket losses and related benefits.
vs. Carnival plc / Maleth Aero
Over 1,000 customers seek compensation for significant flight delays disrupting package holidays with Carnival cruises from November 2023 to March 2024. UK passengers whose holidays were affected can join this ongoing group action led by Hugh James. Claims rejected by airlines are being pursued collectively.
vs. AARP
This settlement resolves claims that video-viewing activity and user identities were shared through tracking technology on AARP.org. People who used the affected video pages may qualify for benefits if they were in the class.
vs. Veezu
This active group claim concerns worker-status issues for Veezu drivers. It is an opt-in claim, so eligible drivers may still be able to join if the litigation remains open.
vs. Automotive manufacturers
This is an active group claim relating to alleged vehicle emissions issues. Leigh Day lists it among its open claims, and affected vehicle owners may still be able to join if their vehicles and dates fit the claim.
vs. Mastercard
A UK collective claim concerning alleged inflated Mastercard interchange fees has reportedly settled, with an expected consumer claims portal to open in the coming months. Eligible people are UK residents who met the residence, age and purchasing criteria during the relevant historical periods; the portal was not yet open on 3 September 2026.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC / South Staffs Water / Cambridge Water
Data breach affecting water company customers' personal details, leading to group compensation claims. UK customers whose information was leaked can participate. Seeks redress for privacy violations.
vs. Mastercard and relevant financial institutions
A proposed consumer redress process is expected for people who purchased goods in UK supermarkets between May 1992 and June 2008, following resolution of funding and litigation issues. Registration is expected to open for six months, but the official claim deadline had not yet been published in the available results.
vs. Manchester Airports Group
A proposed UK group action concerns an alleged Manchester Airports Group data breach. The claim website invites potentially affected individuals to register, but no fixed claim deadline or confirmed settlement amount was identified in the available material.
vs. Uber
Uber drivers have launched collective legal action alleging issues involving algorithmic management and the use of driver data to train artificial intelligence systems. The reporting indicates claims for damages and GDPR-related relief, but does not provide a final UK joining deadline or confirmed compensation figure.
vs. Various pet food manufacturers
Pet owners whose cats suffered from contaminated food are pursuing group compensation for vet bills and pet losses. UK consumers who purchased affected products qualify. Focuses on product liability.
vs. Advanced Recovery Equipment & Supplies
Individuals whose data was compromised in the Advanced Recovery Equipment & Supplies data breach may claim up to $4,250 plus a pro rata cash payment and credit monitoring from a class action settlement.
vs. Ryanair
Passengers affected by Ryanair mass flight cancellations in 2022 and subsequent years are claiming compensation under UK261 regulations through this group litigation. Airlines failed to provide proper assistance or compensation. UK passengers can still join for flights departing from UK airports.
vs. Lloyds Banking Group
Lloyds customers who lost money to authorised push payment (APP) fraud are suing the bank for failing to reimburse scam victims despite regulatory requirements. The bank allegedly did not have adequate fraud prevention systems. UK account holders can join this consumer group action.
vs. Multiple UK Water Companies
Households affected by repeated sewage spills into gardens and properties from UK water companies are claiming damages for negligence and environmental violations. Companies discharged untreated sewage during storms. UK homeowners can join this environmental group litigation.
vs. Uber
Uber drivers are claiming employment rights including minimum wage, holiday pay, and pensions after Supreme Court ruled they are workers not contractors. UK drivers denied worker status can join. This landmark case continues with compensation claims.
vs. HSBC
Homeowners mis-sold interest-only mortgages by HSBC that left them without capital repayment plans are seeking compensation. Bank failed to advise properly on affordability. UK mortgage customers can still opt in.
vs. Johnson & Johnson and Kenvue
The UK talc litigation remains active, with a managed group of claimants and further case-management review scheduled for November 2026. The available report does not confirm a public, court-ordered deadline for new consumers to join, and the litigation may be restricted by the GLO requirements; prospective claimants need an urgent individual eligibility assessment.
vs. Apple
A proposed CAT opt-out collective claim alleges that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency rules disadvantaged third-party app developers while favouring Apple’s own advertising activities. It was filed in September 2026 and still needs CAT certification; UK developers in the proposed class would be included automatically unless they opt out.
vs. Various vehicle manufacturers
Diesel-emissions group litigation remains open for some vehicle manufacturers, jurisdictions and claimant categories, although many England and Wales cut-off dates passed in 2024. The available source expressly warns that availability varies and that Scotland and Northern Ireland follow different arrangements; prospective claimants must confirm manufacturer-specific eligibility with the relevant solicitors.
vs. GRIPA
Individuals whose data was compromised in the GRIPA MOVEit data breach may claim up to $12,500 plus credit monitoring services from a $2.15M class action settlement.
vs. Gandara Mental Health Center
This settlement addresses a data breach that compromised information belonging to Massachusetts residents. Eligible people may claim reimbursement for documented losses up to a stated cap.
vs. Transamerica
This settlement concerns universal life insurance policyholders whose rates were increased. Eligible policyholders may receive at least a minimum payment depending on their policy and claim details.
vs. SP Plus
This settlement involves parking receipt-related claims at Dayton Airport. Eligible consumers may receive a voucher value if they qualify under the settlement terms.
vs. TRISTAR Insurance Group
This settlement resolves claims from a data breach involving TRISTAR Insurance Group. Affected individuals may be able to recover documented losses, out-of-pocket expenses, or an alternate cash payment.
vs. Vauxhall/Opel
This claim alleges that certain Vauxhall diesel vehicles were fitted with emissions systems that did not perform as advertised. Consumers who owned or leased qualifying vehicles may still be able to join if they are within the class and the claim remains on the group register.
vs. Mazda
This group litigation order concerns claims over NOx emissions in certain Mazda vehicles. Consumers who bought, leased, or otherwise held qualifying vehicles may be eligible to join, subject to the court-managed process.
vs. UK Government / NHS-related compensation scheme
This compensation process covers people infected by contaminated blood products and eligible affected family members. Some applications may still be open for certain categories of claimant depending on scheme rules and whether a claim has already been filed.
vs. Valve Corporation
A CAT-certified opt-out claim alleges Valve imposed anti-competitive restrictions and overcharged UK Steam users. Eligible UK consumers are represented automatically; no individual sign-up deadline or compensation-claim process was identified in the available sources.
vs. Multiple vehicle manufacturers
Several UK diesel emissions claims in the Competition Appeal Tribunal seek compensation for purchasers and users of affected vehicles. These are generally opt-out or opt-in collective proceedings depending on the case, and consumers may still be able to participate if the tribunal has not closed the relevant registration or opt-out period.
vs. Multiple heat network operators
This consumer claim concerns charges, billing, or service issues affecting users of heat networks. Residents or leaseholders connected to a qualifying network may still be able to join if they are in the relevant group.
vs. British Car Auctions (BCA)
This active group claim concerns BCA drivers. It appears to be an opt-in collective employment-related claim, so eligible drivers may still be able to join if the claim remains open to new participants.
vs. Labcorp
Individuals whose data was compromised in the Labcorp data breach may claim a payout from a class action settlement resolving allegations of inadequate data security measures.
vs. Google
Elizabeth Coll’s CAT collective proceedings allege that Google abused its position in relation to the Google Play Store and imposed excessive or unfair commissions. The class is understood to operate on an opt-out basis, meaning qualifying UK-domiciled developers are included unless they opt out under a Tribunal order.
vs. Sony Interactive Entertainment
This CAT opt-out claim concerns alleged overcharging for digital games and add-on content bought through the PlayStation Store. The ordinary UK-resident class opt-out deadline passed on 9 March 2026, so UK consumers cannot newly join; however, the case remains unresolved and any later damages-distribution process may require class members to make a claim.
vs. Google LLC and Alphabet entities
The Google Play developer proceedings had a settlement approved in September 2026, but the claims process had not yet opened in the available reporting. It is therefore not a currently claimable settlement on the available evidence, though eligible developers should monitor the administrator and tribunal notice because the expected claim window was four months after opening.
vs. Cat food manufacturer or seller
This consumer group claim concerns allegations that a cat food product was contaminated and caused loss or harm. Pet owners who bought the affected product may still be able to join if the claim window remains open.
vs. Robertson's Transport
Nonexempt hourly employees who worked for Robertson's Transport may claim a cash payment from a class action settlement resolving allegations of wage and hour violations.
vs. Mastercard
The Merricks collective action concerns alleged unlawful interchange fees and seeks compensation for UK consumers who used Mastercard cards during the relevant period. The available reports state that the claims portal had not yet opened as at August 2026 and is expected to provide a six-month registration period once launched.
vs. Beacon CRM
A claims-management company is collecting registrations of interest after the Beacon CRM cyber-security incident. This is not yet a filed group action: registrants will be contacted if a regulated law firm takes forward a UK claim.
vs. Dental practice operators / NHS dental framework defendants
This group claim concerns associate dentists and alleged issues with pay, terms, or working conditions. Dentists who meet the employment criteria may still be able to join while the claim remains open.
vs. Tattooed Chef
Shareholders who purchased Tattooed Chef stock before the securities fraud disclosure may claim $0.11 per share before deductions from a class action settlement resolving allegations of securities fraud.
vs. Thames Water, Severn Trent, United Utilities, Anglian Water, Yorkshire Water and Northumbrian Water
Professor Carolyn Roberts is pursuing an opt-out CAT collective claim alleging that six water companies abused dominant positions in connection with pollution reporting and service quality. The claim is awaiting a Supreme Court appeal listed for February 2027; no consumer opt-out deadline has been reported because certification remains unresolved.
vs. NHS trust(s) or healthcare providers
This group claim concerns delays affecting people awaiting gender-affirming surgery. Patients affected by the relevant delays may still be able to join if they fall within the open class and the claim is still being collected.
vs. Serviceaide
Individuals whose data was compromised in the Serviceaide data breach may claim up to $5,000 from a class action settlement resolving allegations of inadequate data security measures.
vs. Esse Health
Esse Health reached a data breach settlement after information belonging to patients or consumers may have been compromised. Eligible class members can claim a cash payment, with the amount depending on final claims processing.
vs. Nucor
Nucor notified individuals about a June 2025 data breach and then agreed to a class settlement. People who received notice may submit claims for reimbursement of losses and other relief.
vs. Continental Cafe Holdings
Continental Cafe Holdings reached a settlement after a data breach affecting some consumers. People who received a notice may be able to file for cash compensation for documented losses.
vs. Gandara
A settlement was reached after a data breach involving Gandara compromised information of Massachusetts residents. Eligible class members may claim compensation for losses.
vs. Wax Center
Wax Center agreed to settle claims involving website tracking on its online properties. People who visited the website during the class period may qualify for a small cash payment.
vs. Phil Smith Automotive Group
Phil Smith Automotive Group notified consumers about a data breach and settled related claims. Affected people may be eligible for compensation for losses tied to the incident.
vs. Heartland Payments Systems
Heartland Payments Systems agreed to a settlement over allegations that it charged program fees when money was uploaded to the MySchoolBucks website. People who paid those fees may be able to get money back.
vs. Torrid
Torrid agreed to settle claims that it used deceptive discount advertising on its website. Shoppers who bought qualifying products may be able to claim a payment.
vs. Align Technology
Align Technology, maker of Invisalign, settled claims that it colluded to suppress competition. Consumers or purchasers affected by the alleged antitrust conduct may be eligible for compensation.
vs. Vauxhall / Stellantis
This opt-in group action alleges that certain Vauxhall diesel vehicles were fitted with defeat devices or otherwise emitted excessive NOx in real-world driving. UK vehicle owners or lessees of qualifying models may still be able to join if their claim is within the register period and the limitation window has not expired.
vs. Mazda Motor Corporation
This group action concerns allegations that certain Mazda diesel vehicles were equipped with unlawful emissions software or otherwise produced excessive emissions in use. It is an opt-in claim, so affected UK consumers must actively join to participate.
vs. Gafoor (and related defendants)
This High Court group action is listed as an active GLO and relates to claims brought by a group of affected claimants. The precise eligibility depends on the claim register and the pleadings, but it remains a live opt-in collective action for qualifying individuals.
vs. Capita
This claim relates to a data breach involving Capita and is being pursued as an active group claim. People whose personal information was affected may be eligible to join if their circumstances match the claim criteria.
vs. Walleys Quarry / related operators
This group claim concerns alleged nuisance and environmental harm from landfill operations. Local residents or affected property owners may still be able to join if they meet the claim criteria.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This claim concerns alleged defects or issues with diesel particulate filters in Jaguar Land Rover vehicles. Owners of affected vehicles may still be able to join if the claim criteria match.
vs. GRIPA
Individuals whose data was compromised in the July 2024 GRIPA MOVEit data breach may claim up to $12,500 plus credit monitoring from a class action settlement resolving allegations of inadequate data security.
vs. Apple
The Apple ATT proceedings are currently an open potential collective claim for qualifying UK app developers, although they are not yet a certified class action. Developers do not need to file an individual claim at this preliminary stage, but they should monitor the case and preserve evidence because certification and any opt-out period may later impose formal requirements.
vs. Crimson Wine Group
Individuals whose data was compromised in the Crimson Wine Group data breach may claim up to $5,000 plus credit monitoring from a class action settlement resolving allegations of inadequate data security measures.
vs. Hyundai Motor Company / Kia Corporation
This is an opt-in High Court group claim over alleged unlawful diesel emissions controls in certain Hyundai and Kia vehicles. Drivers, owners, and lessees of qualifying models may still be able to join while the action remains on the group register.
vs. Toyota Motor Corporation
This claim alleges that certain Toyota diesel vehicles had emissions issues affecting NOx output in normal driving. UK owners and lessees of the affected models may still join if the action remains open for registration.
vs. Volvo Car Corporation
This opt-in group action alleges excessive emissions from certain Volvo diesel vehicles. Affected UK drivers, owners, and lessees may still be able to join while the claim remains live and before the register closes.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC / South Staffs Water / Cambridge Water
This active group claim concerns an alleged data breach affecting water company customers and potentially other data subjects. UK consumers whose personal data was involved may still be able to join if they are within the claimant group and the filing window remains open.
vs. Ministry of Defence / related agencies
This group claim concerns an alleged data breach connected to the ARAP/EGS arrangements. Individuals whose personal information may have been mishandled can still join if they are within the defined claimant group.
vs. Various operators and polluters linked to the River Wye
This environmental group action relates to alleged pollution of the River Wye and resulting harm to residents, landowners, and affected businesses. UK claimants can still join if they are within the affected group and the filing window is open.
vs. Datavant
This data breach settlement relates to compromised personal information involving Datavant. Affected individuals may be able to file for cash compensation and related benefits if they were notified of the incident.
vs. Thompson Coburn
This settlement resolves claims tied to the May 2024 Thompson Coburn data breach. Individuals who were notified may be able to claim reimbursement for documented losses and possibly credit monitoring.
vs. Esse Health
Esse Health agreed to settle claims relating to a data breach affecting personal information. People who received a notice may be eligible for cash compensation and expense reimbursement.
vs. New River Electrical Corp.
This settlement concerns an alleged data breach affecting personal information tied to New River Electrical Corp. Individuals who received notice may qualify to claim cash relief or credit monitoring.
vs. U.S. Bank
Participants in the U.S. Bank 401(k) savings plan may be eligible to claim a share of a settlement fund. The settlement is open for qualifying plan participants.
vs. Google / YouTube
Google and YouTube settled claims that they collected children’s personal data while minors watched videos. Eligible class members may be entitled to a cash payment if they submit a valid claim.
vs. Torrid
Torrid agreed to settle claims that it advertised deceptive discounts on its website. Eligible shoppers may be able to receive a small cash payment or other settlement benefit.
vs. Fanatics
If you purchased merchandise through the Fanatics websites between May 6, 2018, and March 30, 2026, and paid a handling fee, you may be covered by this settlement.
vs. Google
This is a proposed £260m settlement of a CAT collective claim for UK app developers who distributed apps through Google Play. Eligible UK-domiciled developers are included on an opt-out basis, but payment is expected to require submitting a claim once the Tribunal approves the settlement and publishes a distribution process.
vs. Shoals Technologies
Shareholders who purchased Shoals Technologies stock before the securities fraud disclosure may claim $0.23 per share from a class action settlement resolving allegations of securities fraud.
vs. Apple
A newly filed opt-out CAT claim alleges that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency rules disadvantaged UK third-party app developers by imposing tracking restrictions that Apple did not apply in the same way to its own applications. The claim was reportedly filed on 3 September 2026 and has not yet reached certification, so no joining or opt-out deadline has been fixed.
vs. Manchester Airports Group
A consumer group action is seeking compensation connected with the Manchester Airports Group data breach. The public registration page says it connects potential claimants with regulated UK law firms; the available material does not state a closing date or a fixed settlement amount.
vs. Aetna Life Insurance
Patients whose L-ADR surgery claims were denied by Aetna Life Insurance may claim a payout from a class action settlement resolving allegations of improper claim denials.
vs. EMM Loans
This settlement covers claims arising from a 2024 data breach involving EMM Loans. People notified of the breach may be eligible for cash payments and credit monitoring if they submit a timely claim.
vs. Derick Dermatology
People who made appointments through Derick Dermatology's website during the class period may qualify for a cash payment. The claim amount is relatively small and documentation may not be required.
vs. Hello Wisp
People who bought products from hellowisp.com may be eligible for compensation in this open consumer settlement. Claims appear to be tied to purchases made during the class period.
vs. Google
This settlement concerns allegations related to children's privacy on Google Play. Eligible consumers may be able to claim a pro rata share of the settlement fund.
vs. Hustler Hollywood
This settlement concerns alleged violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act in transaction receipts. Consumers who received qualifying receipts may be able to claim compensation.
vs. Equifax
This long-running data breach settlement covers people affected by the Equifax breach. The FTC still lists the program as active, indicating consumers may still have a claim path or related refund process depending on eligibility.
vs. Western Union
This FTC-listed refund program covers eligible consumers tied to Western Union remediation. Consumers who qualify may still receive a refund or other payment through the claims process.
vs. Invitation Homes
The FTC lists an active refund program for Invitation Homes, which suggests eligible consumers may still be able to claim redress. The settlement relates to consumer-facing practices involving housing services.
vs. Multiple poultry and related operators
This claim concerns alleged environmental damage to the River Wye and surrounding areas. People or businesses affected by the pollution may be able to join the group claim if they meet the solicitor’s criteria.
vs. Walleys Quarry landfill operators
This environmental claim concerns nuisance or pollution issues linked to Walleys Quarry landfill. Residents or nearby property owners who were affected may still be able to participate while the case is open.
vs. Ministry of Defence / related administrators
This is a collective data protection claim concerning the ARAP/EGS data breach and alleged exposure of personal information. People whose details were involved may still be able to join if they fall within the affected cohort.
vs. Carnival plc
This group action concerns flight delays that disrupted package holidays between November 2023 and March 2024. Passengers affected by the disruption may still be able to join if they were part of the impacted trips and have supporting evidence.
vs. Amazon
This is a worker-status and pay-related group claim for Amazon delivery drivers and on-site managers. It may be relevant to UK individuals who worked under arrangements that potentially affected holiday pay or other employment rights.
vs. South Central Bank
This financial settlement concerns alleged overdraft fee practices. Consumers who paid qualifying overdraft fees may be able to claim a share of the fund.
vs. AT&T
Consumers affected by the AT&T data throttling matter may still be able to access refund benefits through the FTC-listed active program. This is a telecom-related consumer redress program for eligible users.
vs. Multiple vehicle manufacturers
This active group claim covers alleged vehicle emissions issues affecting consumers and vehicle owners. People who bought, leased, or financed qualifying vehicles may still be able to join if their vehicle is included in the claim.
vs. Uber
This is an active group claim for Uber drivers, typically focused on worker status and related pay or rights issues. Drivers who meet the relevant criteria may still be able to join.
vs. Sony Interactive Entertainment Network Europe Limited
This Competition Appeal Tribunal opt-out claim alleges that Sony abused a dominant position by requiring PlayStation users to purchase digital games and add-ons through the PlayStation Store, where prices were allegedly excessive. UK-domiciled consumers who bought qualifying digital PlayStation content during the class period are generally included automatically unless they opted out; the published opt-out deadline was 9 March 2026, so no new filing is required to remain in the class.
vs. Vonage
This open FTC refund program concerns money returned to eligible Vonage customers. Consumers who meet the program rules may still be able to receive payment.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC, South Staffs Water, Cambridge Water
This is an active data breach group claim run as part of UK group claims. Consumers who were affected by the breach may be able to join while the claim remains open.
vs. Just Eat
This claim concerns couriers engaged by Just Eat and related employment or contractor-status issues. Couriers who meet the case criteria may still be able to join while it remains active.
vs. The Seven Motor Corp.
Job seekers who applied for a position with The Seven Motor Corp. in Washington since 2023 may qualify for a cash payment from this settlement. It covers applicants whose pay-related rights may have been violated during the hiring process.
vs. Barefoot Dreams
Consumers who purchased a product from barefootdreams.com between October 14, 2023, and June 1, 2026 may be eligible for a cash payment. The case concerns website privacy allegations tied to online purchases.
vs. Triage Staffing
People who received a notice about the Triage Staffing data breach may qualify for money and other benefits. The settlement is for individuals whose personal information may have been exposed in the breach.
vs. Google
An opt-out Competition Appeal Tribunal claim alleges that Google overcharged UK advertisers for search advertising. UK-domiciled businesses and organisations that paid for Google search advertising between 1 January 2011 and 15 April 2025 are reportedly included automatically, subject to the Tribunal’s final class and notice arrangements.
vs. Oak View Group
Individuals whose information was compromised in the 2023 Oak View Group data breach may be eligible for compensation. The settlement may include reimbursement for documented losses and other cash benefits.
vs. Differin
Consumers who purchased eligible cleansers or spot treatments may receive a payment from this product settlement. The claims concern allegations that certain products were unstable and could degrade into benzene.
vs. Eureka Casino Hotel
People whose personal data was exposed in the November 2024 Eureka Casino Hotel security breach can claim a $100 flat payment or up to $5,000 for documented out-of-pocket losses, plus two years of identity protection.
vs. Booking.com
The Bed and Breakfast Association has filed a CAT collective proceedings claim against Booking Holdings and Booking.com concerning alleged competition-law infringements affecting accommodation providers. The available CAT results show the claim was active in August 2026, but no consumer-facing joining deadline or final class definition was identified.
vs. Multiple vehicle manufacturers
This is a broad description of live UK diesel emissions group claims covering alleged defeat devices or excess NOx emissions across several manufacturers. These claims are opt-in, so affected vehicle owners must actively join the relevant action to be included.
vs. Google / Alphabet
Professor Barry Rodger’s CAT collective action concerns allegedly excessive or unfair Google Play commissions charged to UK app developers. The claim was settled in September 2026 for £260 million, but the settlement notice and opt-out mechanics remain relevant: eligible UK-domiciled developers should monitor the official claim site for the final distribution and any opt-out deadline.
vs. Apple Inc. and related Apple companies
A collective action filed at the Competition Appeal Tribunal on 3 September 2026 alleges that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency rules harmed UK app developers’ advertising businesses. It is opt-out, so eligible UK-based developers are represented automatically; the case is newly filed and has not yet been certified, and this is not a settlement or an individual compensation claim form.
vs. Bayer / Bayer-owned Essure manufacturer
This group litigation relates to allegations about the Essure permanent contraception device and the injuries or losses said to have followed its use. People who meet the case criteria may still be able to join if the court register remains open.
vs. Amazon
This is a UK collective claim about alleged anti-competitive marketplace conduct affecting consumers, sellers, or both depending on the case definition. People may still be able to join if the action is open and their purchases or sales fall inside the affected period.
vs. Various defendants
Join the Claim maintains a live register of UK group actions and collective claims, including cases where consumers can register interest before a formal action is launched. These are not all certified proceedings or settlements, so eligibility, deadlines and the identity of the defendant must be checked on each individual claim page.
vs. Apple
Which? is pursuing an opt-out CAT action alleging that Apple unlawfully tied iPhone and iPad users to iCloud and charged excessive prices for storage. Eligible UK consumers are included automatically if the tribunal-approved class definition covers them; this is an ongoing claim rather than an open cash-settlement form, so consumers should follow the representative’s notices rather than submit duplicate claims.
vs. Meta Platforms
This is a collective data protection claim in the UK concerning alleged misuse of personal data under GDPR and related laws. It is a live collective action structure where affected users may still be able to participate if they fall within the class definition.
vs. Various financial firms
This category covers live UK collective claims involving alleged consumer mis-selling or unfair fees in financial products or services. If a case remains open, consumers can still join where the claim is opt-in or be represented where the tribunal has certified a class.
vs. Apple
ATT Collective Action Limited has brought a proposed UK CAT collective action alleging that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency framework disadvantaged rival app developers and distorted competition. This is a developer claim, not a consumer payout scheme; eligible UK-based app developers can monitor the proceedings and registration arrangements through the representative’s solicitors.
vs. Mastercard
This Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action concerns alleged unlawful interchange fees in the payment card market. UK consumers and businesses may be able to benefit if they fall within the certified class, although these claims are usually structured as opt-out or mixed collective proceedings rather than individual settlements.
vs. Various defendants
This category covers UK environmental group claims, including nuisance, pollution, and emissions disputes managed collectively under a group litigation order. Claimants can only take part if they join the register before it closes.
vs. Servier Laboratories and others
A health-related collective claim is listed in the Tribunal documents. The search results confirm it is active, but they do not provide a consumer filing deadline or settlement deadline.
vs. Grindr Inc.
A High Court group action alleging unlawful processing and disclosure of sensitive Grindr user data settled for £26 million in September 2026. Reports indicate that the settlement concerns UK users of the free app whose data was processed before 2020; the represented group was approximately 12,000 people, and late registration may be accepted while the settlement is being implemented, but the final court-approved deadline should be checked directly with the solicitors.
vs. Apple
A proposed CAT opt-out collective action alleges Apple used its App Tracking Transparency framework to disadvantage rival app developers and suppress their advertising revenues. UK app developers fitting the proposed class are automatically represented if the CAT certifies the action; the website accepts registrations of interest and provides updates.
vs. Google
This is a UK collective action in the Competition Appeal Tribunal concerning app store practices and alleged overcharging or exclusionary conduct. Consumers may still be able to be included if the proceeding remains live and they fall within the affected user group.
vs. Various employers
This covers live UK group litigation over shared employment disputes such as pay, deductions, or workplace claims. It remains relevant where workers are still being admitted to a group register or collective proceeding.
vs. Apple
A new UK collective action alleges Apple’s App Tracking Transparency rules harmed app developers by making it harder for rival apps to compete and advertise. It is at an early stage, so eligible developers are currently in the class unless and until they opt out if the case is certified.
vs. Apple
This collective action concerns alleged anti-competitive app store fees and rules affecting UK users and developers. It is a live collective redress case type in the CAT, so affected consumers may still be able to join or benefit depending on class status.
vs. Various manufacturers
This refers to UK collective claims over allegedly defective consumer products that caused loss or injury. These are typically opt-in claims, so the consumer must join the proceedings to be included.
vs. Metropolitan Police Service / Operation Fortitude defendants
Operation Fortress is a UK data-breach group claim involving allegations that personal data was compromised. The case is due before the Supreme Court in October 2026, and the claimant update says the ordinary six-year limitation period has not expired for members; this is an opt-in litigation claim rather than a completed settlement.
vs. Flagstar Bank
Flagstar Bank agreed to settle claims tied to a data breach. Class members may be able to recover compensation for documented losses, a cash payment without proof, and free credit monitoring.
vs. Wisp
People who bought products from hellowisp.com may qualify for a cash payment under the settlement. The claim listing indicates that eligible consumers can still submit claims.
vs. Barefoot Dreams
Consumers who purchased from the Barefoot Dreams website during the class period may be eligible for a small cash payment. The settlement concerns alleged website privacy or advertising-related claims.
vs. Booking Holdings Inc. / Booking.com
A CAT collective proceeding has been listed and appears to be ongoing. The search results show a fresh collective proceedings claim form summary, suggesting consumers or businesses affected by Booking.com practices may still be at an early filing stage, but no joining deadline was visible in the results provided.
vs. Nissan
This is another diesel emissions GLO listed by the UK government. It allows similar claims to be handled together, and consumers with affected vehicles may still be able to join if they are within the litigation class.
vs. Apple
A separate news report says the new Apple ATT claim has been filed at the CAT and is at its earliest stage. Because certification has not yet occurred, no opt-out window is open yet, but the claim is currently live and could matter for affected UK developers.
vs. Manchester Airports Group
A law firm is accepting registrations for a proposed multi-claimant action concerning the 2026 Manchester Airports Group cyber incident. No certified GLO or settlement was identified in the available results, so registration is an expression of interest and not a guaranteed right to compensation.
vs. Manchester Airport Group
KP Law is investigating a group data-breach claim concerning Manchester Airport Group. People who received a breach notification, or believe that they were affected, can register to join the investigation and receive information about a compensation claim if it proceeds.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
Consumers who bought Deep River Snacks products may qualify for settlement payments. The case concerns alleged false advertising and is listed as open to claims in the source database.
vs. Unknown
The GOV.UK GLO register lists this as an active group litigation order. The public register does not provide the full underlying facts in the snippet available here, but the case remains on the official list, meaning claimants may still be able to join through the court-approved process if eligible.
vs. Peugeot
This is a registered group action over alleged diesel emissions issues. UK consumers who own or leased affected vehicles may still be able to join if the claim has not closed to new members.
vs. Mastercard
This collective proceedings claim is listed in the Tribunal documents as an active case. The search results do not show a final settlement approval or a passed claim deadline, so it remains one to watch for eligible UK claimants affected by card interchange practices.
vs. Albany Park
Consumers who purchased Albany Park furniture may claim from a $15M class action settlement regarding false discount claims.
vs. Beacon / George House Trust-related data controllers
Join the Claim is collecting registrations concerning the Beacon CRM breach, in which a database containing customer information and attachments was reportedly copied and likely downloaded. The page describes a potential claim rather than an approved settlement or formal GLO, so consumers should confirm who the proposed defendants are and whether a retainer has actually been opened.
vs. Several chicken processors
Consumers who bought fresh or frozen raw chicken from qualifying processors in certain states may be eligible for a payment. The settlement expands an earlier chicken-procurement antitrust settlement and is still listed as open.
vs. Volkswagen
This group litigation concerns allegations that diesel vehicles emitted more pollution in real-world driving than allowed or advertised. Owners or lessees of eligible Volkswagen diesel vehicles may be able to participate if they are within the registered group.
vs. Citroën
This GLO concerns alleged excess diesel emissions and consumer misrepresentation claims involving Citroën vehicles. It remains on the official list of group litigation orders, so claimants may still be able to join if the litigation is still accepting members.
vs. International Distribution Services Plc (formerly Royal Mail Plc)
The Tribunal documents show an ongoing collective claim involving bulk mail services. The materials provided do not show a passed deadline, so businesses affected by the alleged conduct may still be able to join or monitor the claim.
vs. Axon
Washington job applicants may claim an estimated $1,193.35 from an $8.5M class action settlement regarding job applicant privacy violations.
vs. Vehicle manufacturers involved in Pan-NOx litigation
The Pan-NOx Emissions Group Litigation concerns alleged emissions-control and defeat-device issues in diesel vehicles. Available information indicates that some UK vehicle claims remain dependent on manufacturer, vehicle and jurisdiction, while many England and Wales cut-off dates have already passed; potential claimants must therefore obtain a manufacturer-specific limitation and group-register check before treating this as open.
vs. Google
The Competition Appeal Tribunal approved a £260 million settlement for UK-domiciled third-party app developers over Google Play commissions. Eligible developers who sold digital content through Google Play from August 2018 are automatically within the class and can register to receive notification when the compensation process opens.
vs. Mastercard
This is a Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action alleging that Mastercard’s interchange fees caused losses to UK consumers and businesses. It is an opt-out style competition claim for UK-domiciled class members, so consumers may be included automatically unless they opt out, and some related claimant-finder activity has remained open at various stages of the proceedings.
vs. Mercedes-Benz
This GLO concerns diesel emissions allegations against Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Consumers with affected cars may be able to join if they meet the criteria and the claim window remains open.
vs. Various
The official UK GLO regime includes data breach and privacy cases, and the current register indicates that some matters remain active. Because the public register excerpt available here does not list a single consumer-facing data breach case with a clear open claims link, this entry reflects the active category rather than a specific named settlement.
vs. UK water companies
A major collective action alleging abuse of dominance by water companies remains alive after the UK Supreme Court granted permission to appeal. It is not yet a compensation-paying settlement, but the claim is still active and could potentially progress if the appeal succeeds.
vs. Various vehicle manufacturers
Some diesel-emissions group claims outside the closed England and Wales registers may still accept claimants, particularly depending on the manufacturer, Scotland or Northern Ireland jurisdiction, and whether the individual claim is already within limitation. The available source expressly warns that many England and Wales cut-offs passed in 2024, so this entry should be treated as a screening route rather than proof that every diesel claim remains open.
vs. Bayer / Conceptus
This GLO concerns claims over the Essure permanent birth control device and alleged harm or inadequate warnings. It is designed for multiple similar claims to be managed together, and affected claimants may still be able to join if the litigation remains open.
vs. Ford
This group litigation involves claims over alleged diesel emissions discrepancies in Ford vehicles. Consumers with qualifying vehicles may still be able to join if they are accepted into the group claim.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This group action alleges issues with diesel emissions from Jaguar Land Rover vehicles. It remains on the official GLO register, so eligible claimants may still be able to join if they act through the group process.
vs. Rebound Orthopedics & Neurosurgery
Individuals whose personal and medical data was compromised in the Rebound Orthopedics & Neurosurgery breach can claim cash payments or credit monitoring, with payments up to $75.
vs. Renault
This claim concerns alleged excess diesel emissions and related consumer losses. It is a registered group litigation matter, so joining is only possible through the opt-in GLO process.
vs. FMC Health
Individuals who received a notice about the July 2022 FMC Health data breach may qualify for cash compensation and credit monitoring. The settlement is currently open for claims.
vs. Henderson & Walton Women's Center
Current and former patients affected by the breach may be able to claim cash compensation. The settlement is open for claims according to the listing.
vs. Robbie D. Wood Inc.
People whose data may have been compromised in the October 2024 breach may be eligible for a cash settlement. The settlement is open and includes possible monitoring benefits.
vs. U.S. Bank
Participants in the U.S. Bank 401(k) savings plan may be eligible for a share of the settlement fund. This is a retirement-plan settlement rather than a consumer claim, but it is listed as open.
vs. Bestway
Consumers who bought eligible spa pumps may be able to claim a refund from the settlement. The claims window remains open.
vs. Nucor
Individuals who received a data breach notice from Nucor may qualify for compensation and monitoring. The settlement remains open for claims.
vs. Hellowisp
Consumers who bought products from the Hellowisp website during the covered period may be eligible for a cash payment. The settlement is open and appears to be a low-dollar consumer refund case.
vs. Stor-a-File
This claim concerns alleged misuse or exposure of personal data held by Stor-a-File. Individuals whose information was compromised may still be able to join while the claim remains open.
vs. International Motors / Navistar
Employees or plan participants who paid a tobacco surcharge under the health plan may qualify for a cash payment. The case is listed as preliminarily approved.
vs. Various defendants
This group action concerns environmental damage and pollution impacts affecting the River Wye. People, landowners, and businesses with losses or interference caused by the alleged pollution may still be able to join.
vs. thebigword
This group claim concerns alleged issues affecting interpreters or workers connected with thebigword. People who worked under the relevant arrangements may still be able to join if they meet the claim definition.
vs. South West Water
This group claim concerns alleged sewage pollution affecting rivers and coastal waters in the South West of England. It is an opt-in claim, so consumers and property owners who think they were affected can still check whether they qualify to join if the claim is still being accepted.
vs. Addison Lee
This employment-status group claim concerns drivers who say they were treated incorrectly as self-employed rather than workers or employees. Drivers who meet the case criteria may still be able to join if the claim is active.
vs. Google LLC and Alphabet entities
A separate Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action brought for UK Android device users concerning Google Play commissions remained live after the developer settlement. The available reporting says the class period was extended to 31 July 2026 and a September 2026 opt-out/opt-in deadline applied to a newer cohort; because that deadline was close to or before the reference date and the official current status is not available, consumers should verify availability directly before relying on this entry.
vs. Aldi
This Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action alleges that Aldi used a fuel purchasing arrangement that reduced competition and may have led to higher prices for consumers. UK consumers who bought eligible fuel during the relevant period may be able to claim if they fall within the certified class.
vs. Unknown / multiple defendants
This group claim relates to alleged pollution and environmental harm affecting the River Wye. People and businesses connected to the affected area may be able to join if they fall within the claimant group and the action is still open.
vs. Uber
This claim concerns Uber drivers seeking worker-status or related employment rights. Drivers who worked in the relevant period and satisfy the claim criteria may still be able to join if the claim is open.
vs. Microsoft
This competition collective action concerns alleged anticompetitive conduct relating to Microsoft 365 licensing. UK businesses or consumers within the certified class may still be able to join or benefit depending on the class definition and the stage of the proceedings.
vs. Walleys Quarry landfill / related operators
This claim concerns alleged nuisance and pollution connected to the Walleys Quarry landfill site. Local residents and others affected by odour, emissions, or related impacts may be able to join if still within the active claim group.
vs. FREENOW
This group claim concerns drivers who say they were wrongly treated as independent contractors instead of workers. Eligible drivers may still be able to join if the case is open and they meet the criteria.
vs. Multiple vehicle manufacturers
These are group litigation claims concerning alleged unlawful defeat devices and excess nitrogen oxide emissions from diesel vehicles. Owners or lessees of affected vehicles may still be able to join if their vehicle is included in the relevant claim groups.
vs. Bayer / related entities
This group claim concerns alleged harm linked to the Essure female sterilisation device. Women who had the device implanted and meet the claim criteria may still be able to join if the action remains open.
vs. Vehicle manufacturers
This group claim concerns alleged unlawful vehicle emissions behaviour affecting owners and lessees of certain vehicles. UK consumers who bought or leased affected vehicles may still be able to join if they are in the eligible class.
vs. Just Eat
This claim concerns couriers who say they should have been treated as workers or employees rather than self-employed contractors. Couriers who fit the class definition may still be able to join.
vs. Apple Inc.
A proposed Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action alleges that Apple’s App Tracking Transparency framework disadvantaged UK app developers by imposing stricter tracking-consent requirements on rivals than on Apple’s own advertising activities. The claim was filed in September 2026 and is not yet certified, so eligible developers should monitor the claim site for certification and any future opt-out or participation process.
vs. Google
The CAT approved a £260 million settlement in a collective action brought for UK app developers. The claims process was reported as not yet open, but developers can register on the claim website to receive updates; the available information does not give a claims deadline or confirm that claim submissions are currently being accepted.
vs. Apple Inc. and others
This is a newly certified Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action concerning alleged harm to UK consumers from Apple’s App Store practices. The source available here confirms a collective proceedings order dated 28 September 2026, but does not establish a consumer sign-up process or a deadline; eligible UK consumers may be included automatically if the action is opt-out.
vs. Google LLC and others
A Competition Appeal Tribunal action alleges Google’s Play Store practices caused loss to UK consumers who made purchases on Android devices. Search results say UK-domiciled class members are included automatically unless they opt out, but the reported opt-out deadline for the newly added class period was 15 May 2026, which has passed; a separate settlement distribution or claim deadline has not been confirmed.
vs. Post Office Limited
The Post Office Group Litigation Order compensation scheme concerns former sub-postmasters and others affected by the Horizon system. The cited government progress report confirms the scheme is active, but the available result does not provide a claim deadline or establish that general UK consumers can join; it is a claimant-specific redress scheme, not a consumer class claim.
Important
This tracker is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Claim details, deadlines, and eligibility criteria may change. Always verify details on the official settlement or claim website before filing. NoReply does not process claims or collect personal data through this tool.
Class action settlements and group litigation orders in both countries.
See which claims are closing soon so you never miss a payout.
Browse every open claim and file directly. We don’t collect your data.
Over 90% of eligible people never file. Don't leave money on the table.
Lawyers file on behalf of a group of people harmed by a company’s actions.
The company agrees to pay a settlement fund rather than go to full trial.
Eligible people can file a claim, usually a simple form with no lawyer needed.
After the deadline passes and claims are processed, payouts are sent by cheque or bank transfer.
A class action is a lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of people who suffered similar harm from a company. When settled, eligible people ("class members") can file a claim for compensation, often without needing a lawyer.
The UK has Group Litigation Orders (GLOs) and collective actions through the Competition Appeal Tribunal. They work similarly: a representative brings a claim on behalf of affected consumers. Some are opt-in (you must join) and some are opt-out (you’re included automatically).
No. Most class action claims and UK group litigation orders can be joined without a lawyer. You simply fill out a claim form on the settlement website before the deadline.
Payouts vary wildly, from a few pounds or dollars for consumer claims, to thousands for data breaches or financial misconduct. The estimated payout shown on each claim gives you a range based on current information.
We automatically research and verify open claims on a regular basis using AI-powered legal research. Each claim shows when it was last verified. Always check the official claim website for the latest details.
Class actions aren't the only way to get your money back. NoReply helps you build a professional complaint letter that companies can't ignore.
Other places this tool comes in handy - plus the companies most likely to be on the receiving end.
This tool provides general information, not legal advice. NoReply is not a law firm and is not regulated by the SRA, BSB, FCA, or any other legal or financial regulator. Calculations, suggestions, and references to consumer law are based on AI and publicly available information and may be inaccurate, incomplete, or out of date.
You are solely responsible for verifying everything before relying on it, and for any complaint or claim you choose to pursue. For complex or high-value disputes, consult a qualified solicitor. Read the full disclaimer.
Last reviewed: by NoReply Editorial