Companies pay out billions in settlements every year. Most people never file. Check if you qualify and claim what you're owed.
Class action settlements and group litigation orders in both countries.
See which claims are closing soon so you never miss a payout.
Browse every open claim and file directly. We don't collect your data.
These claims close within 30 days. File before the deadline or you lose out.
326 claims found
vs. Evening Post Publishing
Individuals affected by an Evening Post Publishing data breach can claim cash compensation plus credit monitoring from a $500,000 settlement.
vs. ACV Auctions
Individuals who applied for a job with ACV Auctions in Washington between January 2023 and July 2025 may qualify to claim a cash settlement payment from a $2.7 million settlement.
vs. Trinity Petroleum
Trinity Petroleum experienced a data breach in October 2024 that exposed customer personal information. Affected individuals can claim up to $5,600 from this settlement.
vs. Bank of America
This settlement concerns ATM fee claims related to 7-Eleven transactions. Consumers who paid qualifying fees may still be able to submit a claim.
vs. British Airways
Passengers whose payment card details were stolen in the 2018 British Airways data breach are pursuing compensation through CAT collective proceedings. The airline failed to secure customer data adequately. UK affected consumers can still register claims.
vs. Cardiovascular Consultants Ltd.
Affected U.S. residents can file claims tied to a data breach involving their personal information. The source says claimants may receive cash, reimbursement for documented losses, and medical monitoring.
vs. Motive Technologies
A settlement is open for U.S. residents who received a prerecorded robocall from Motive Technologies on their cell phone. Eligible people can claim a $50 product voucher with no documentation required.
vs. Sony
Sony engaged in anticompetitive practices on the PlayStation Store. Consumers who purchased digital games may be eligible for compensation from this $7.85M settlement.
vs. Pawn America Minnesota, Payday America, PAL Card Minnesota
Pawn America is paying to settle claims over a September 2021 data breach exposing Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, and financial account information. Eligible U.S. customers can claim $30 cash without proof or up to $5,000 with documented losses.
vs. Tom's of Maine, Colgate-Palmolive
Tom's of Maine and Colgate-Palmolive agreed to settle over toothpaste manufacturing practices following an FDA inspection. U.S. purchasers between November 2020 and March 2026 can file for a refund with or without proof of purchase.
vs. Pawn America Minnesota, Payday America, PAL Card Minnesota
Pawn America is paying $3.185 million to settle claims over a September 2021 data breach that exposed Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, and financial account information. Eligible U.S. customers can claim cash payments.
vs. Tom's of Maine, Colgate-Palmolive
Tom's of Maine and Colgate-Palmolive agreed to a $2.9 million settlement over toothpaste manufacturing practices following an FDA inspection. U.S. purchasers between November 2020 and March 2026 can file for a refund.
vs. Pawn America
Pawn America (including Pawn America Minnesota, Payday America, and PAL Card Minnesota) is paying $3.185 million to settle claims over a September 2021 data breach that exposed Social Security numbers, driver's license numbers, and financial account information.
vs. Tom's of Maine and Colgate-Palmolive
Tom's of Maine and Colgate-Palmolive agreed to a $2.9 million settlement over toothpaste manufacturing practices following an FDA inspection. U.S. purchasers of Tom's of Maine toothpaste between November 2020 and March 2026 can file for a refund.
vs. Motive Technologies
Motive Technologies made illegal prerecorded or artificial voice calls to consumers. Affected individuals can claim a $50 product voucher from this $21.4M settlement.
vs. Pennsylvania State Education Association (PSEA)
The PSEA suffered a data breach that compromised members' private information. Affected individuals can claim up to $5,000 plus credit monitoring services from this $2.5M settlement.
vs. Tom’s of Maine
This settlement is for consumers who bought eligible Tom’s of Maine toothpaste during the class period. The case concerns allegations about product labeling or marketing, and claimants may receive a cash payment.
vs. Tom’s of Maine
Consumers who bought certain Tom’s of Maine toothpaste products may be eligible for a cash payment without submitting proof of purchase. The case involves product-related claims about the toothpaste.
vs. Posh Group, Inc.
This settlement resolves claims that Posh charged California event ticket buyers undisclosed fees. California residents who bought qualifying tickets during the claim period may receive a cash payment.
vs. Posh Group, Inc.
Posh Group agreed to a settlement involving a breach of personal information. Eligible consumers may submit a claim for monetary relief under the class settlement.
vs. Oglethorpe
Personal information was compromised in a data breach affecting Oglethorpe customers. Eligible individuals can claim up to $2,500 from this $350K settlement.
vs. Teva Pharmaceuticals, Granules, and Heritage Pharmaceuticals
This settlement resolves claims that certain generic metformin drugs were contaminated with NDMA and did not meet FDA standards. U.S. consumers who paid for a qualifying metformin-containing drug during the covered period may file without proof of purchase.
vs. Unknown
Consumers who paid for certain metformin-containing drugs may file a claim for cash compensation. The settlement says no proof of purchase is required.
vs. Teva Pharmaceuticals, Granules, and Heritage Pharmaceuticals
This settlement resolves claims that certain generic metformin drugs were contaminated with NDMA and did not meet FDA standards. U.S. consumers who paid for a qualifying metformin-containing drug during the covered period can file a claim without proof of purchase.
vs. Wisp
Wisp agreed to settle claims involving website privacy issues related to purchases made on its site. Consumers who bought qualifying products during the class period may be able to claim a cash payment.
vs. Wisp
Wisp resolved claims involving alleged privacy violations tied to purchases made through its website. People who bought products from hellowisp.com during the class period may be able to claim a cash payment.
vs. Wisp
This settlement addresses allegations about privacy practices on hellowisp.com. Consumers who bought products through the website during the covered period may qualify for a cash payment.
vs. Tuft & Needle
Tuft & Needle agreed to settle claims that it misrepresented mattress discounts to shoppers. People who bought qualifying mattresses may be eligible for a cash award or website credit depending on how they file.
vs. Tuft & Needle, LLC
Tuft & Needle agreed to settle claims that it deceptively advertised discounts on mattresses sold to California consumers. Eligible buyers can submit a claim for a cash award based on the represented discount amount.
vs. Tuft & Needle
This consumer settlement concerns alleged false mattress discount advertising on tuftandneedle.com. California shoppers who bought a discounted mattress during the class period may claim a cash payment.
vs. State Farm
State Farm improperly handled total loss claims for Alabama policyholders. Eligible claimants can receive $20.50 from this settlement.
vs. Ashley Furniture / Resident Home
Ashley Furniture and Resident Home sold defective mattresses that failed to meet quality standards. Consumers who purchased certain mattresses between October 2017 and June 2024 can claim a pro rata voucher.
vs. Not specified in source
Patients who used the portal during the listed date range may file a claim for a small cash payment. The source states no documentation is required.
vs. Nutramax Laboratories
Nutramax Laboratories agreed to an $11.5 million settlement over allegations it misrepresented the joint health benefits of Cosequin canine supplements. California residents who bought qualifying dog Cosequin products between May 3, 2016 and May 6, 2022 can claim compensation.
vs. Nutramax
Consumers who bought qualifying Cosequin dog supplement products may be able to claim a share of this settlement. The case concerns alleged product-related issues involving the supplements.
vs. Generac
This settlement resolves claims involving Generac PWRcell SnapRS devices. Affected purchasers may be eligible for compensation, with the amount varying based on the claim details.
vs. Fidelity Investments
$2.5M settlement for a data breach affecting customers' personal information. Class members can claim up to $5,000 in losses, pro rata payments, and credit monitoring.
vs. Fidelity Investments
This settlement covers claims that a cyberattack on Fidelity's computer network exposed customer personal and financial information. People whose information was impacted may claim reimbursement for documented losses, a cash payment, and credit monitoring.
vs. Bestway
Consumers who purchased a Bestway spa pump during the class period may be eligible for a payment from the settlement fund. The source lists the claim window as still open.
vs. Ministry of Defence
Group litigation with registration period extended until end of July 2026. Claimants can register claims and will have opportunity to consider claims in light of causation and damages judgment expected in Spring 2026.
vs. Teva
Teva agreed to pay a settlement over allegations it blocked generic QVAR inhalers from the market, allegedly causing overcharges to consumers and health plans. Eligible claimants may receive a cash payment from the fund.
vs. Unknown
Consumers who purchased QVAR or QVAR Redihaler during the eligible period may file a claim for cash compensation. The settlement covers purchases in 43 states and appears to be open for claims.
vs. Teva Pharmaceuticals
Consumers who purchased QVAR or QVAR Redihaler during the covered period in one of 43 states may be eligible for a cash payment. The settlement is open for claims and has a filing deadline in late July 2026.
vs. Barefoot Dreams
Consumers who purchased something from barefootdreams.com during the covered period may qualify for a small cash payment. The settlement is open and does not appear to require proof of purchase.
vs. Actelion Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research & Development
This settlement resolves allegations that the companies delayed generic bosentan from entering the market. Third-party payors such as health plans, insurers, and union benefit funds may be able to claim a share of the fund.
vs. Actelion Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Research & Development
This settlement resolves antitrust claims that generic bosentan was delayed from entering the market. It is limited to third-party payors, such as health plans and insurers, rather than individual consumers.
vs. Sprouts Farmers Market
Sprouts Farmers Market agreed to pay $5 million to resolve allegations credit/debit card receipts showed last five digits of card numbers and EBT purchases were mishandled. Qualifying purchasers between specified dates may be eligible.
vs. Flagstar Bank
Flagstar Bank agreed to a $31.5 million settlement over a data incident. Class members may be able to claim cash for documented losses, a residual cash payment, and credit monitoring depending on the notice they received.
vs. Duke Health
U.S. residents who logged into Duke MyChart or the MyDuke Health app during the covered period can file for a pro rata cash payment. The source says no documentation is required.
vs. Duke University Health System
This settlement resolves allegations that tracking pixels on the Duke MyChart patient portal may have shared patients' health-related data with a third-party vendor. U.S. residents who logged into Duke MyChart or the MyDuke Health app during the class period can claim a pro rata cash payment.
vs. Duke Health
This settlement covers claims that Duke Health’s MyChart or MyDuke Health app may have disclosed or tracked user information. People who logged in during the covered period may be eligible for a pro rata cash payment.
vs. Duke University Health System
Duke University Health System agreed to a settlement over allegations that tracking pixels on its MyChart portal may have shared patients' health-related data with a third-party vendor. U.S. residents who used the portal or app during the class period can file a pro rata cash claim.
vs. Bestway
People who purchased a Bestway spa pump between May 2021 and May 2024 may be eligible for a cash payment. The settlement resolves claims related to the product.
vs. Bestway
This settlement concerns allegations about spa pumps sold by Bestway. Consumers who bought qualifying spa pumps during the claim period may be eligible for a cash payment.
vs. Tinder
This settlement resolves allegations of discrimination tied to Tinder Plus and Gold membership practices. Eligible class members may still submit claims before the deadline.
vs. Tinder
Tinder discriminated against users by charging different prices based on age. Users who paid higher subscription fees for Tinder Plus or Gold may be eligible for compensation from this $60.5M settlement.
vs. Ciuni & Panichi
Individuals notified about the Ciuni & Panichi data breach may submit a claim for compensation from the class action settlement. The settlement includes cash benefits and is still listed as open in the source data.
vs. Mt. Baker Imaging
People whose private information may have been compromised in the Mt. Baker Imaging breach can file a claim. The settlement offers cash compensation and data monitoring benefits.
vs. Not specified in source
Current owners and primary users who bought the covered product before the listed cutoff may claim a pro rata cash payment. The settlement also allows additional reimbursement for repair costs or energy losses.
vs. CR&R Environmental Services
This settlement covers people whose personal information may have been exposed in the 2022 CR&R data breach. Eligible claimants may request cash compensation and credit monitoring services.
vs. Lakeview Health
This settlement covers claims that a January 2024 data breach compromised personal information. Individuals whose information may have been exposed can submit a claim for cash compensation and credit monitoring.
vs. CR&R Environmental Services
Individuals who received notice about the CR&R 2022 data breach may be eligible for cash and credit monitoring. The claim window is still open.
vs. Keller Williams & RE/MAX
Keller Williams and RE/MAX will pay $28.5 million to settle claims that homebuyers paid inflated commissions on MLS-listed homes. Homebuyers in the U.S. during state-specific class periods may qualify.
vs. Henderson & Walton Women's Center, P.C.
Henderson & Walton Women's Center agreed to settle over a February 2022 data breach exposing patients' personal and protected health information. Eligible class members can claim up to $2,500 cash plus three years of free credit and medical identity monitoring.
vs. Henderson & Walton Women's Center, P.C.
Henderson & Walton Women's Center agreed to a class action settlement over a February 2022 data breach that potentially exposed patients' personal and protected health information. Eligible class members can claim cash compensation plus credit and medical identity monitoring.
vs. Berman & Rabin
This settlement covers people whose personal information may have been exposed in a July 2024 data breach. Eligible class members can seek cash compensation and credit monitoring if they received notice or were affected by the breach.
vs. Fanatics
This settlement covers consumers who bought merchandise on Fanatics websites and were charged a handling fee during the class period. Eligible claimants may receive voucher benefits under the settlement.
vs. Henderson & Walton Women's Center
Settlement over a February 2022 data breach that exposed patients' personal and protected health information. Affected patients can claim up to $2,500 cash plus free credit and medical monitoring.
vs. Henderson & Walton Women’s Center
This settlement resolves claims tied to a data breach affecting the medical center. People who received notice that their information was involved may be eligible for cash compensation and related relief.
vs. Toyota
Toyota agreed to a $299.5 million settlement over emissions issues in IC forklifts. Owners may receive cash payments, service plans, and warranties.
vs. Lloyds Banking Group
Millions overcharged on car finance (PCP/HP agreements) due to undisclosed dealer commission payments. GLO manages claims for refunds of excess interest. Customers can still join before trial dates.
vs. Amazon
Prime subscribers charged excessive delivery fees despite membership promises. Group claim alleges breach of contract. UK Prime members can join.
vs. British Airways
Passengers affected by the 2018 data breach where personal and payment data was stolen from BA's website. A GLO was established to combine claims for compensation due to privacy violations. Affected UK customers can still join if they haven't already.
vs. Microsoft
UK consumers affected by Microsoft's 2024 data breach exposing email addresses and other personal data are part of an ongoing collective action in the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Victims can claim compensation for distress and identity theft risks. Claims remain open for those whose data was compromised.
vs. Hyundai and Kia
Owners or lessees of qualifying Hyundai or Kia vehicles may be eligible for reimbursement and a separate payment. The settlement resolves claims that certain vehicles contain defective airbag control units.
vs. Hyundai and Kia
Owners or lessees of certain Hyundai or Kia vehicles may be eligible for reimbursement and a separate payment tied to defective airbag control unit allegations. The claim deadline has not yet passed.
vs. Google
Android users' location data collected without proper consent (2016-2024). Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action for privacy damages. UK Android users eligible to join.
vs. Ticketmaster
UK music fans overcharged due to Ticketmaster's dynamic pricing practices during high-demand sales like Oasis reunion tickets are in a collective consumer claim. Prices surged artificially beyond face value. Consumers who bought affected tickets can join.
vs. Volkswagen Group
Continuation of dieselgate claims against VW for installing defeat devices that falsified emissions tests. UK owners of affected vehicles seek compensation for reduced vehicle value. Late joiners can still add claims to the GLO register.
vs. Capital Health
Capital Health agreed to pay $4.5 million to resolve allegations it failed to protect consumers’ personal information in a 2023 data breach exposing Social Security numbers, clinical information, and email addresses. The lawsuit claimed inadequate cybersecurity measures. Affected individuals from the Nov. 11-26, 2023 breach may qualify.
vs. Pacific Life
Pacific Life agreed to pay $58.3 million to resolve allegations it sold indexed universal life insurance policies using misleading illustrations with inflated projections and undisclosed costs. Consumers who purchased these policies in California between 2016 and 2019 may qualify.
vs. GlaxoSmithKline
GlaxoSmithKline settlement over Boostrix vaccine issues. Recipients of the vaccine may qualify for payments with or without proof of vaccination.
vs. Stade de France organisers
UK fans disrupted by chaos and security failures at the 2022 Champions League final at Stade de France seek compensation. Affected ticket holders can still join this cross-border group action. Claims for distress, injury, and financial loss.
vs. McDonald's
UK franchisees and possibly consumers affected by McDonald's franchise model issues or food-related claims are grouped for compensation. Details involve operational failures impacting parties. Eligible claimants can opt-in.
vs. Alpine Ear, Nose & Throat
Individuals whose private information the Alpine ENT data breach potentially compromised may be eligible to claim from a class action settlement. The breach exposed personal information of affected individuals.
vs. Google
Black or Black+ Google employees in certain roles may be eligible to claim a cash payment from a $50 million class action settlement over racial discrimination allegations. The settlement is preliminarily approved.
vs. E-Benefit Solution
Individuals who received notice of the E-Benefit Solution data breach may be eligible to claim from a class action settlement. The breach impacted personal information of notified individuals.
vs. Gafoor
This is an open UK group litigation order listed by the Government’s official register. It is an opt-in High Court group action, so consumers or other affected people can only participate if they join the claim within the court-managed process.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This open group litigation concerns claims associated with diesel particulate filters and is listed on the official UK group litigation register. It is an opt-in proceeding, meaning people must actively join if their claim is covered.
vs. Glencore
Large-scale securities group action brought by hundreds of claimants against Glencore under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000. Liability trial scheduled for October 2026. This is a follow-on claim related to prior regulatory investigations.
vs. Rightmove PLC
£1 billion opt-out competition class action against Rightmove PLC, the UK's largest online property portal. Funded by Innsworth Capital. Consumers affected by alleged anti-competitive practices can claim without taking action.
vs. BHP Group (UK) Ltd
Multi-defendant consumer and environmental group action with major liability and quantum trials listed through 2026. Relates to environmental damage and consumer losses from BHP operations.
vs. Skyline Apartments
Former tenants may qualify for a cash payment if they lived at the property for at least one month during the covered years. The settlement is open for claims.
vs. AT&T
Customers affected by two 2024 data breaches may claim settlement benefits. The source says the settlement includes compensation and credit monitoring.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
Old Lyme Gourmet, maker of Deep River Snacks, settled false advertising claims for $4 million over non-GMO labeling on products containing GMOs. Consumers who purchased the snacks are eligible for payment. The packaging allegedly misled buyers about ingredients.
vs. Hillcrest Convalescent Center
People whose private information was exposed in the June 2024 breach may be eligible for compensation. The source describes the matter as open for claims.
vs. Advance Auto Parts
Consumers who received a data breach notification from Advance Auto Parts may be eligible for up to $5,100. The $10 million settlement addresses exposure of sensitive information like Social Security numbers.
vs. Multiple defendants
UK group litigation orders can also cover environmental damage and public nuisance claims, including pollution and chemical spill cases. Individuals who suffered harm or loss from the relevant incident may still be able to join if the action remains open.
vs. Various U.S. chicken processors
Several chicken processors settled collusion claims to inflate raw chicken prices, expanding a prior settlement fund. Eligible purchasers of fresh or frozen raw chicken from listed processors in 24 states/DC from 2012-2019 can claim. No new claim needed if prior claim submitted.
vs. Wright Brothers Construction
This settlement is for individuals who received a notice that their information may have been exposed in a data breach involving Wright Brothers Construction. Qualifying class members may claim cash compensation and credit monitoring.
vs. Vivimed
Vivimed settled allegations over contamination in Losartan drug. Consumers who purchased the drug can claim cash payments.
vs. Post Office Limited
Subpostmasters were wrongly prosecuted or financially ruined due to faults in the Horizon IT system between 1999 and 2015. This GLO manages claims from affected subpostmasters who issued proceedings against the Post Office. Consumers who were subpostmasters can join if they meet the criteria and the register is still open.
vs. Pawn America
Pawn America reached a $3.19M settlement over a customer data breach. Affected customers may claim up to $5,000 plus additional payments.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This group litigation order concerns alleged issues with diesel particulate filters in Jaguar Land Rover vehicles. Owners or lessees of affected vehicles may still be able to join if their claim fits the active group action criteria.
vs. Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd
Nigerian communities affected by oil spills in the Bille and Ogale areas brought claims against Shell for environmental damage and cleanup. The GLO manages these related claims in the UK courts. UK consumers or representatives who qualify can join ongoing proceedings.
vs. Volkswagen Group
Volkswagen installed defeat devices in diesel vehicles to cheat emissions tests, affecting UK consumers who purchased or leased impacted cars from 2009 onwards. This major GLO allows affected owners to join claims for compensation. Consumers can still join as the group action remains active.
vs. Lloyds Banking Group
Lloyds sold loan products that allowed investors to offset income tax, later ruled unlawful tax avoidance schemes. Affected investors can join the GLO for repayment claims. UK consumers who invested can still participate.
vs. Cathay Pacific Airways
Cathay Pacific suffered a data breach exposing personal data of 9.4 million passengers. Affected UK passengers can join the group claim for compensation due to privacy violations. The action remains open for eligible claimants.
vs. Microsoft Corporation
Microsoft email accounts were hacked, exposing data of UK customers including government officials. Victims can join the GLO seeking damages for the breach. Claims are ongoing for affected consumers.
vs. Rivian
People who applied for a job with Rivian in Washington State during the covered period may be entitled to a cash payment. The settlement concerns alleged failures to disclose salary ranges in job postings.
vs. Ticketmaster
Fans overpaid for Taylor Swift Eras Tour tickets due to hidden dynamic pricing practices in 2024. GLO launched to claim compensation for inflated prices. UK ticket buyers can still register to join the action.
vs. P&O Ferries
P&O sacked 800 seafarers without notice in 2022, replacing with cheaper agency workers. Affected UK workers can join claims for unfair dismissal. GLO remains active.
vs. Uber
Uber drivers claim worker rights including minimum wage and holiday pay after Supreme Court ruled they are workers not contractors. UK drivers can join the ongoing GLO. Claims still open.
vs. Flex-N-Gate / Ventra
Hourly production employees may qualify for a cash payment under this employment settlement. The source identifies the case as open for claims.
vs. Various U.S. chicken processors
Settlement expands fund for consumers who purchased raw chicken from listed processors in 24 states/DC between Jan 1, 2012 and July 31, 2019. Collusion to fix prices alleged.
vs. Evenflo
Consumers who bought covered booster seats during the listed period may be eligible for compensation. The settlement resolves safety-related claims involving the product.
vs. Volvo
This is another reference to the Volvo emissions group litigation listed by the government as a current group litigation order. It remains relevant for consumers who owned or leased vehicles covered by the claim and may still be able to opt in.
vs. Comcast
Comcast reached a settlement over a data breach affecting customer information. The class action addresses the failure to protect consumer data. Individuals impacted by the breach may be eligible.
vs. Google
Google settled a class action over Android mobile device privacy issues. The lawsuit claimed privacy violations. Users of affected Android devices may qualify.
vs. Various U.S. chicken processors
Several chicken processors settled allegations of colluding to increase raw chicken prices. Purchasers of fresh or frozen raw chicken from qualifying processors in 24 states or DC between January 1, 2012, and July 31, 2019, may be eligible; no new claim needed if prior claim submitted.
vs. StubHub
StubHub settled FTC claims over deceptive ticket pricing and mandatory fees. Consumers who bought tickets for U.S. events on May 12-14, 2025, may qualify for refunds. The settlement provides fee reimbursements.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
UK consumers who purchased Jaguar Land Rover vehicles affected by faulty Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) that failed to meet emissions standards are claiming compensation for reduced vehicle value and repair costs. The High Court granted a Group Litigation Order to manage these claims collectively. Claimants can still join via the group register managed by lead solicitors.
vs. South West Water
This group claim concerns alleged sewage pollution affecting customers and communities. Leigh Day lists it as active, and people affected by the pollution may still be able to join if they fall within the claim period and area.
vs. Various heat network operators
Consumers overcharged or poorly served by district heat networks are claiming refunds and compensation. UK residents connected to affected networks can join. Addresses systemic failures in communal heating systems.
vs. ARAP/EGS
This group data protection claim relates to an alleged personal data breach affecting a defined set of individuals. UK consumers whose data was affected may still be able to join if they are within the impacted cohort and the claim remains open.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC, South Staffs Water, Cambridge Water
Customers of these water companies had data breached, exposing personal information and leading to compensation claims for misuse risks. The group litigation unites affected consumers. UK customers impacted can still register.
vs. The Gafoor Group
Consumers harmed by property or construction issues from The Gafoor Group developments are claiming damages through this GLO. It covers defective buildings or mis-selling to buyers. UK purchasers or residents can join the register.
vs. Post Office Ltd
This group action concerns allegations that the Post Office wrongly accused and prosecuted sub-postmasters because of faults in the Horizon IT system. It is listed as a group litigation order, and consumers/former postmasters who fit the listed criteria may still be able to join if they are within the court-managed group register and any joining window remains open.
vs. Absolute Dental Group
Consumers who received notice from Absolute Dental Group about a 2025 data breach may be eligible for compensation. The settlement addresses the data breach impacting affected individuals.
vs. NextEra Energy
Individuals who participated in the NextEra Energy 401(k) plan may qualify for a cash payment from a settlement over alleged ERISA violations. The class period runs through March 17, 2026.
vs. Mubi
Individuals for whom Mubi renewed a subscription in California between April 1, 2021, and May 31, 2025, may qualify due to deceptive pricing practices.
vs. Concentric
Individuals who applied for a job with Concentric in Washington state since Jan. 1, 2023, may qualify over labor law violations in hiring practices.
vs. Post Office Limited
Claims by subpostmasters or affected individuals against Post Office Limited, likely related to Horizon scandal or similar accounting issues. GLO manages all qualifying claims collectively. Eligible UK claimants can join by issuing claim form.[6]
vs. Vauxhall
This group litigation order concerns alleged unlawful emissions behavior in certain Vauxhall diesel vehicles. UK consumers who owned or leased affected vehicles may still be able to join if the claim register remains open.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
Old Lyme Gourmet, maker of Deep River Snacks, agreed to pay to settle false advertising claims that packaging misled consumers into believing products were non-GMO despite containing GMOs.
vs. Multiple defendants
UK group litigation can include data breach and privacy claims, and open cases may still allow consumers to join on an opt-in basis. Eligibility depends on whether the individual was affected by the specific breach and whether the claim is still on the group register.
vs. Krispy Kreme
Krispy Kreme agreed to a $1.6 million settlement after a November 2024 data incident exposed customers' names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, and financial account information. Class members can claim cash plus credit monitoring.
vs. Endue Software
Individuals whose data the February 2025 Endue Software incident impacted may be eligible to claim from a class action settlement. The incident compromised personal data of affected individuals.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
Old Lyme Gourmet, which makes snacks under the Deep River Snacks label, agreed to pay $4 million to settle allegations of false advertising. The case alleged product packaging misled consumers into believing the product was non-GMO when it contained genetically modified ingredients.
vs. Sony Interactive Entertainment
Collective proceedings in the Competition Appeal Tribunal alleging Sony overcharged for digital games and content on PlayStation platform due to anticompetitive practices. UK consumers who purchased digital games can join if certified. Application recently filed and open for participation.
vs. Gafoor Group
This is a High Court group litigation order listed by the UK government. The published register indicates the claim is active, and affected consumers or other eligible claimants may still be able to participate depending on the court's registration process.
vs. Daimler, DAF, Iveco, MAN, Scania, and Volvo/Renault
This is a Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action over alleged truck cartel conduct and overcharges. The UK regime is opt-in for direct claims in these proceedings, so fleet purchasers and other eligible claimants may still be able to join if the case remains open.
vs. Various U.S. chicken processors
This settlement covers allegations that several chicken processors colluded to raise the price of raw chicken. Consumers who bought qualifying raw chicken in certain states during the class period may still file a claim.
vs. Various Crypto Exchanges
Multiple claims in CAT allege anticompetitive behaviour by cryptocurrency exchanges affecting UK consumers. Consumers who traded on these platforms during specified periods can potentially join certified proceedings. Among 25 current CAT cases awaiting certification.
vs. Unknown (Gafoor-related)
Group litigation order issued for claims involving Gafoor, likely related to consumer or property issues based on court listing. UK consumers affected by the common issues can apply to join the group register. Specific details on the nature of claims are listed in the High Court order.
vs. Various Card Networks
Collective proceedings in CAT over excessive merchant interchange fees passed on to UK consumers, increasing costs. Consumers who made card payments may be eligible to join pre-certification. One of 25 current CAT cases.
vs. Crimson Wine Group
This settlement covers people whose data may have been exposed in a Crimson Wine Group breach. Eligible claimants can seek money and credit monitoring.
vs. Rivian
Applicants who applied for jobs in Washington State may be eligible for a cash payment from a settlement alleging Rivian failed to disclose salary ranges in job postings. The settlement is open for claims.
vs. Volvo
This open group litigation concerns alleged NOx emissions claims against Volvo and appears on the government’s current GLO register. Eligible claimants must opt in to take part.
vs. Nissan
This open GLO concerns alleged NOx emissions claims against Nissan and is listed on the official register. It is not an automatic class action; consumers must opt in to be covered.
vs. Hyundai
This open UK GLO relates to alleged Hyundai NOx emissions issues. It remains on the official register, meaning eligible people may still be able to join if they act within the court process.
vs. Apple Inc.
CAT collective action claiming anticompetitive practices related to Apple batteries, potentially affecting device performance and pricing for UK consumers. Open for consumers to join pending certification. Part of recent wave of tech competition claims.
vs. Various Cryptocurrency Exchanges
Multiple yet-to-be-certified collective proceedings in CAT against crypto exchanges for alleged anticompetitive behavior affecting UK consumers. Consumers who traded on these platforms during specified periods may qualify to join. Claims are at early stages and open.
vs. SAG-AFTRA Health Plan
This settlement resolves claims tied to a data breach involving the SAG-AFTRA Health Plan. Affected individuals may be eligible for reimbursement, a pro rata cash payment, and credit monitoring.
vs. Transamerica Life Insurance
$57M settlement for policyholders affected by universal life insurance rate increases since November 1, 2021. Eligible owners can receive minimum $200 payments.
vs. Post Office Limited
This High Court group litigation concerns sub-postmasters and others who say the Horizon IT system caused accounting discrepancies, wrongful accusations, or related losses. It is relevant to people who were eligible to join the original group register and to related redress processes, but the main GLO proceedings themselves are no longer an open joiner claim.
vs. Various Heat Network Operators
Consumers overcharged or misbilled by heat network operators for district heating services are claiming refunds and compensation. The group action targets systemic billing issues. UK residents affected can join the claim.
vs. FREENOW
This is a group claim involving drivers for FREENOW. Leigh Day lists it as active, and eligible drivers may still be able to join if they satisfy the case criteria.
vs. Flo
Users of the Flo app during the settlement class period may be eligible to claim cash from a privacy settlement. The claim process is open for qualifying users.
vs. Tuft & Needle
Consumers in California who bought certain discounted mattresses may be eligible for a payment from a settlement over pricing allegations. The claim is open for qualifying purchasers.
vs. Mazda
This open UK group litigation order covers Mazda NOx emissions claims listed on the official register. It is a collective opt-in action, so only joined claimants are included.
vs. BMW
This is an active UK group litigation order involving alleged BMW NOx emissions claims. The official register indicates the litigation is open, and claimants must join the group to participate.
vs. Volkswagen
This is an open group litigation order over alleged Volkswagen NOx emissions claims. It is a collective claim, but participation requires active opt-in rather than automatic inclusion.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
This settlement resolves allegations that Deep River Snacks packaging falsely suggested the products were non-GMO. Consumers who bought qualifying products may be able to claim compensation.
vs. BCA
Drivers transporting vehicles for BCA (vehicle auction firm) claiming worker status entitlements like minimum wage and rest breaks. Group litigation for logistics drivers. Open to qualifying drivers.
vs. Lemonade
This settlement concerns a data breach involving Lemonade and is open to eligible consumers who were affected. Claimants may be able to obtain compensation if their information was involved.
vs. Peugeot
This open group litigation concerns alleged NOx emissions claims against Peugeot. The claim is managed as an opt-in group action, so claimants must take active steps to join.
vs. Renault
This active GLO concerns alleged Renault NOx emissions claims and is listed on the current UK register. Consumers can only participate by joining the group claim.
vs. Various Pet Food Manufacturers
Pet owners whose cats suffered illness or death from contaminated cat food are seeking damages for veterinary costs and loss. This collective action addresses product liability failures. Eligible UK pet owners can join.
vs. Lands' End
Consumers whose information was exposed in the 2024 Lands' End data breach may be eligible for cash compensation and credit monitoring. The settlement is currently open for claims.
vs. Amazon
This settlement concerns alleged meal and rest break violations affecting hourly employees in Washington state. Workers who meet the class definition may be eligible for payment.
vs. Vauxhall
This is an open UK group litigation order relating to alleged NOx emissions issues. The official register confirms it is active, and claimants must join the action to be included.
vs. Citroën
This is an open UK GLO for alleged NOx emissions claims involving Citroën vehicles. Because GLOs in England and Wales are opt-in, only registered claimants can pursue the claim collectively.
vs. Kia
This is an open group litigation order involving alleged NOx emissions claims against Kia. The action is still listed as current, and claimants must join to be included.
vs. Fidelity Investments
Fidelity Investments suffered a data breach that compromised customer personal and financial information. Affected customers can claim compensation from this $2.5M settlement.
vs. Berman & Rabin
People whose information was exposed in the Berman & Rabin data breach may be eligible for a settlement payment and credit monitoring. Claims are currently open.
vs. Teva Pharmaceuticals
Teva engaged in price-fixing for QVAR inhalers, artificially inflating prices for consumers. Individuals who purchased QVAR inhalers can claim compensation from this $35M settlement.
vs. Navistar / International Motors
People who paid a tobacco surcharge in the company health plan may qualify for a settlement payment. The claim period is open for eligible participants.
vs. Ford
This is an ongoing UK group litigation order concerning alleged Ford NOx emissions issues. The register shows it remains active, and claimants need to join rather than being included automatically.
vs. Mercedes-Benz
This open group litigation order covers claims alleging Mercedes NOx emissions issues. It is an opt-in claim, so affected consumers need to take action to join.
vs. Grubhub
Grubhub charged excessive delivery fees to California customers in violation of state law. California consumers who used Grubhub can claim compensation from this $5M settlement.
vs. Ryanair
Passengers denied full compensation for mass flight cancellations in 2022. GLO claims airlines failed EU261 obligations. Affected flyers can still join.
vs. Onsite Mammography
This settlement is for people whose personal data was allegedly compromised in a data breach involving Onsite Mammography. Eligible class members may be able to submit claims for compensation and related benefits.
vs. Uber
This group claim concerns Uber drivers and their employment or pay-related rights. Leigh Day lists it as active, indicating some drivers may still be able to join if they qualify.
vs. Walleys Quarry
This group claim concerns alleged nuisance or pollution connected with the landfill site. Leigh Day lists it as active, so people affected by odors or pollution may still be able to join.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover (JLR)
Owners of Jaguar Land Rover vehicles claim that Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) were defective, causing excessive repair costs and reduced vehicle usability. The GLO was established in November 2024 to manage these claims collectively. UK consumers who purchased affected models can still join the group register.
vs. Boston Children’s Health Physicians
This settlement resolves claims tied to a 2024 data breach that reportedly affected hundreds of thousands of people. Eligible individuals may claim cash compensation and related benefits if their information was involved.
vs. Stor-a-File
This group claim relates to an alleged data breach at Stor-a-File. Leigh Day lists it as an active claim, meaning eligible affected individuals may still be able to join.
vs. Post Office Limited
Subpostmasters affected by the Horizon IT scandal continue to pursue claims through the GLO for wrongful convictions, financial losses, and reputational damage. The GLO covers all claims against Post Office Limited by affected claimants. Additional victims can still opt-in to the group register.
vs. UK Water Companies (Thames, United Utilities, etc.)
Claims against water companies for illegal sewage discharges affecting properties and health. GLO covers private nuisance and negligence claims. Affected households/businesses can opt-in.
vs. Multiple Banks
Ongoing GLO for PPI policies sold with loans/mortgages where time-barred individual claims can join group action. Covers single premium policies. Eligible consumers can still register.
vs. Mt. Baker Imaging
This settlement addresses a data breach affecting patients or other individuals whose information may have been exposed. Qualified class members can seek cash compensation, a pro rata payment, and data monitoring.
vs. Ministry of Defence
This is a group claim relating to a data breach connected with ARAP/EGS matters. Leigh Day lists it as an active group claim, indicating consumers or affected individuals may still be able to join if they meet the claimant criteria.
vs. Addison Lee
This is a group claim for drivers against Addison Lee. Leigh Day lists it as active, suggesting drivers who meet the claim criteria may still be able to join.
vs. Parcelforce
This is a group claim for owner drivers connected with Parcelforce. Leigh Day lists it as active, so eligible drivers may still be able to join.
vs. Various river pollution defendants
This active group claim concerns environmental harm associated with pollution in the River Wye area. Leigh Day lists it as open, meaning affected residents or landowners may still be able to join.
vs. Multiple competition law defendants
The CAT allows collective proceedings for breaches of competition law, including opt-in and opt-out cases. Open CAT claims can still be joined or participated in if the tribunal has certified the class and the claim is still live.
vs. Robbie D. Wood Inc.
This settlement covers people whose information may have been exposed in the October 2024 Robbie D. Wood breach. Class members may be able to claim compensation if they were notified or otherwise affected.
vs. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
A $5.85 million settlement for drivers who had total loss auto claims with Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance. The suit alleged improper claim handling and valuation practices. Eligible policyholders receive pro rata cash payments.
vs. Google
Google agreed to pay $68 million to settle privacy claims related to Google Assistant recordings and data collection without proper consent. U.S. users of Google Assistant devices during the class period qualify. Payments vary based on usage.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet (Deep River Snacks)
$4 million settlement over false 'non-GMO' advertising on Deep River Snacks packaging that actually contained GMOs. Purchasers of affected products qualify for cash payments. Covers misleading labeling claims.
vs. Various U.S. Chicken Processors
Chicken processors settled collusion claims to artificially inflate raw chicken prices. Consumers who bought fresh or frozen raw chicken in 24 states/DC from Jan 1, 2012 to July 31, 2019 qualify. No new claim needed if prior claim submitted.
vs. Gafoor
This is a UK group litigation order listed by the courts, indicating a live multi-claim action managed together because the claims share common issues. Claimants may still be able to join if their claim falls within the registered group and the register remains open.
vs. Circle K
Circle K resolved claims stemming from a May 2024 data breach. Consumers who received notice may be able to claim compensation for documented out-of-pocket losses and related benefits.
vs. Carnival plc / Maleth Aero
Over 1,000 customers seek compensation for significant flight delays disrupting package holidays with Carnival cruises from November 2023 to March 2024. UK passengers whose holidays were affected can join this ongoing group action led by Hugh James. Claims rejected by airlines are being pursued collectively.
vs. AARP
This settlement resolves claims that video-viewing activity and user identities were shared through tracking technology on AARP.org. People who used the affected video pages may qualify for benefits if they were in the class.
vs. Veezu
This active group claim concerns worker-status issues for Veezu drivers. It is an opt-in claim, so eligible drivers may still be able to join if the litigation remains open.
vs. Automotive manufacturers
This is an active group claim relating to alleged vehicle emissions issues. Leigh Day lists it among its open claims, and affected vehicle owners may still be able to join if their vehicles and dates fit the claim.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC / South Staffs Water / Cambridge Water
Data breach affecting water company customers' personal details, leading to group compensation claims. UK customers whose information was leaked can participate. Seeks redress for privacy violations.
vs. Various pet food manufacturers
Pet owners whose cats suffered from contaminated food are pursuing group compensation for vet bills and pet losses. UK consumers who purchased affected products qualify. Focuses on product liability.
vs. Ryanair
Passengers affected by Ryanair mass flight cancellations in 2022 and subsequent years are claiming compensation under UK261 regulations through this group litigation. Airlines failed to provide proper assistance or compensation. UK passengers can still join for flights departing from UK airports.
vs. Lloyds Banking Group
Lloyds customers who lost money to authorised push payment (APP) fraud are suing the bank for failing to reimburse scam victims despite regulatory requirements. The bank allegedly did not have adequate fraud prevention systems. UK account holders can join this consumer group action.
vs. Multiple UK Water Companies
Households affected by repeated sewage spills into gardens and properties from UK water companies are claiming damages for negligence and environmental violations. Companies discharged untreated sewage during storms. UK homeowners can join this environmental group litigation.
vs. Uber
Uber drivers are claiming employment rights including minimum wage, holiday pay, and pensions after Supreme Court ruled they are workers not contractors. UK drivers denied worker status can join. This landmark case continues with compensation claims.
vs. HSBC
Homeowners mis-sold interest-only mortgages by HSBC that left them without capital repayment plans are seeking compensation. Bank failed to advise properly on affordability. UK mortgage customers can still opt in.
vs. Gandara Mental Health Center
This settlement addresses a data breach that compromised information belonging to Massachusetts residents. Eligible people may claim reimbursement for documented losses up to a stated cap.
vs. Transamerica
This settlement concerns universal life insurance policyholders whose rates were increased. Eligible policyholders may receive at least a minimum payment depending on their policy and claim details.
vs. SP Plus
This settlement involves parking receipt-related claims at Dayton Airport. Eligible consumers may receive a voucher value if they qualify under the settlement terms.
vs. TRISTAR Insurance Group
This settlement resolves claims from a data breach involving TRISTAR Insurance Group. Affected individuals may be able to recover documented losses, out-of-pocket expenses, or an alternate cash payment.
vs. Vauxhall/Opel
This claim alleges that certain Vauxhall diesel vehicles were fitted with emissions systems that did not perform as advertised. Consumers who owned or leased qualifying vehicles may still be able to join if they are within the class and the claim remains on the group register.
vs. Tom's of Maine
Consumers who bought certain Tom's of Maine toothpaste products may be able to claim settlement benefits. The source says this is an open settlement for qualifying purchases.
vs. Mazda
This group litigation order concerns claims over NOx emissions in certain Mazda vehicles. Consumers who bought, leased, or otherwise held qualifying vehicles may be eligible to join, subject to the court-managed process.
vs. UK Government / NHS-related compensation scheme
This compensation process covers people infected by contaminated blood products and eligible affected family members. Some applications may still be open for certain categories of claimant depending on scheme rules and whether a claim has already been filed.
vs. Multiple vehicle manufacturers
Several UK diesel emissions claims in the Competition Appeal Tribunal seek compensation for purchasers and users of affected vehicles. These are generally opt-out or opt-in collective proceedings depending on the case, and consumers may still be able to participate if the tribunal has not closed the relevant registration or opt-out period.
vs. Multiple heat network operators
This consumer claim concerns charges, billing, or service issues affecting users of heat networks. Residents or leaseholders connected to a qualifying network may still be able to join if they are in the relevant group.
vs. British Car Auctions (BCA)
This active group claim concerns BCA drivers. It appears to be an opt-in collective employment-related claim, so eligible drivers may still be able to join if the claim remains open to new participants.
vs. Cat food manufacturer or seller
This consumer group claim concerns allegations that a cat food product was contaminated and caused loss or harm. Pet owners who bought the affected product may still be able to join if the claim window remains open.
vs. Dental practice operators / NHS dental framework defendants
This group claim concerns associate dentists and alleged issues with pay, terms, or working conditions. Dentists who meet the employment criteria may still be able to join while the claim remains open.
vs. NHS trust(s) or healthcare providers
This group claim concerns delays affecting people awaiting gender-affirming surgery. Patients affected by the relevant delays may still be able to join if they fall within the open class and the claim is still being collected.
vs. Esse Health
Esse Health reached a data breach settlement after information belonging to patients or consumers may have been compromised. Eligible class members can claim a cash payment, with the amount depending on final claims processing.
vs. Nucor
Nucor notified individuals about a June 2025 data breach and then agreed to a class settlement. People who received notice may submit claims for reimbursement of losses and other relief.
vs. Continental Cafe Holdings
Continental Cafe Holdings reached a settlement after a data breach affecting some consumers. People who received a notice may be able to file for cash compensation for documented losses.
vs. Gandara
A settlement was reached after a data breach involving Gandara compromised information of Massachusetts residents. Eligible class members may claim compensation for losses.
vs. Wax Center
Wax Center agreed to settle claims involving website tracking on its online properties. People who visited the website during the class period may qualify for a small cash payment.
vs. Phil Smith Automotive Group
Phil Smith Automotive Group notified consumers about a data breach and settled related claims. Affected people may be eligible for compensation for losses tied to the incident.
vs. Heartland Payments Systems
Heartland Payments Systems agreed to a settlement over allegations that it charged program fees when money was uploaded to the MySchoolBucks website. People who paid those fees may be able to get money back.
vs. Torrid
Torrid agreed to settle claims that it used deceptive discount advertising on its website. Shoppers who bought qualifying products may be able to claim a payment.
vs. Align Technology
Align Technology, maker of Invisalign, settled claims that it colluded to suppress competition. Consumers or purchasers affected by the alleged antitrust conduct may be eligible for compensation.
vs. Vauxhall / Stellantis
This opt-in group action alleges that certain Vauxhall diesel vehicles were fitted with defeat devices or otherwise emitted excessive NOx in real-world driving. UK vehicle owners or lessees of qualifying models may still be able to join if their claim is within the register period and the limitation window has not expired.
vs. Mazda Motor Corporation
This group action concerns allegations that certain Mazda diesel vehicles were equipped with unlawful emissions software or otherwise produced excessive emissions in use. It is an opt-in claim, so affected UK consumers must actively join to participate.
vs. Gafoor (and related defendants)
This High Court group action is listed as an active GLO and relates to claims brought by a group of affected claimants. The precise eligibility depends on the claim register and the pleadings, but it remains a live opt-in collective action for qualifying individuals.
vs. Capita
This group claim concerns an alleged data breach involving Capita. Leigh Day lists it among its active group claims, which means affected people may still be able to join if their data was exposed and they qualify.
vs. Walleys Quarry / related operators
This group claim concerns alleged nuisance and environmental harm from landfill operations. Local residents or affected property owners may still be able to join if they meet the claim criteria.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This group claim concerns alleged diesel particulate filter issues in Jaguar Land Rover vehicles. Leigh Day lists it as active, so vehicle owners may still be able to join if their cars are covered.
vs. Hyundai Motor Company / Kia Corporation
This is an opt-in High Court group claim over alleged unlawful diesel emissions controls in certain Hyundai and Kia vehicles. Drivers, owners, and lessees of qualifying models may still be able to join while the action remains on the group register.
vs. Toyota Motor Corporation
This claim alleges that certain Toyota diesel vehicles had emissions issues affecting NOx output in normal driving. UK owners and lessees of the affected models may still join if the action remains open for registration.
vs. Volvo Car Corporation
This opt-in group action alleges excessive emissions from certain Volvo diesel vehicles. Affected UK drivers, owners, and lessees may still be able to join while the claim remains live and before the register closes.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC / South Staffs Water / Cambridge Water
This active group claim concerns an alleged data breach affecting water company customers and potentially other data subjects. UK consumers whose personal data was involved may still be able to join if they are within the claimant group and the filing window remains open.
vs. Ministry of Defence / related agencies
This group claim concerns an alleged data breach connected to the ARAP/EGS arrangements. Individuals whose personal information may have been mishandled can still join if they are within the defined claimant group.
vs. Various operators and polluters linked to the River Wye
This environmental group action relates to alleged pollution of the River Wye and resulting harm to residents, landowners, and affected businesses. UK claimants can still join if they are within the affected group and the filing window is open.
vs. Datavant
This data breach settlement relates to compromised personal information involving Datavant. Affected individuals may be able to file for cash compensation and related benefits if they were notified of the incident.
vs. Thompson Coburn
This settlement resolves claims tied to the May 2024 Thompson Coburn data breach. Individuals who were notified may be able to claim reimbursement for documented losses and possibly credit monitoring.
vs. Esse Health
Esse Health agreed to settle claims relating to a data breach affecting personal information. People who received a notice may be eligible for cash compensation and expense reimbursement.
vs. New River Electrical Corp.
This settlement concerns an alleged data breach affecting personal information tied to New River Electrical Corp. Individuals who received notice may qualify to claim cash relief or credit monitoring.
vs. U.S. Bank
Participants in the U.S. Bank 401(k) savings plan may be eligible to claim a share of a settlement fund. The settlement is open for qualifying plan participants.
vs. Google / YouTube
Google and YouTube settled claims that they collected children’s personal data while minors watched videos. Eligible class members may be entitled to a cash payment if they submit a valid claim.
vs. Torrid
Torrid agreed to settle claims that it advertised deceptive discounts on its website. Eligible shoppers may be able to receive a small cash payment or other settlement benefit.
vs. EMM Loans
This settlement covers claims arising from a 2024 data breach involving EMM Loans. People notified of the breach may be eligible for cash payments and credit monitoring if they submit a timely claim.
vs. Derick Dermatology
People who made appointments through Derick Dermatology's website during the class period may qualify for a cash payment. The claim amount is relatively small and documentation may not be required.
vs. Hello Wisp
People who bought products from hellowisp.com may be eligible for compensation in this open consumer settlement. Claims appear to be tied to purchases made during the class period.
vs. Google
This settlement concerns allegations related to children's privacy on Google Play. Eligible consumers may be able to claim a pro rata share of the settlement fund.
vs. Hustler Hollywood
This settlement concerns alleged violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act in transaction receipts. Consumers who received qualifying receipts may be able to claim compensation.
vs. Equifax
This long-running data breach settlement covers people affected by the Equifax breach. The FTC still lists the program as active, indicating consumers may still have a claim path or related refund process depending on eligibility.
vs. Western Union
This FTC-listed refund program covers eligible consumers tied to Western Union remediation. Consumers who qualify may still receive a refund or other payment through the claims process.
vs. Invitation Homes
The FTC lists an active refund program for Invitation Homes, which suggests eligible consumers may still be able to claim redress. The settlement relates to consumer-facing practices involving housing services.
vs. Multiple poultry and related operators
This claim concerns alleged environmental damage to the River Wye and surrounding areas. People or businesses affected by the pollution may be able to join the group claim if they meet the solicitor’s criteria.
vs. Walleys Quarry landfill operators
This is a group claim over alleged nuisance and pollution from the Walleys Quarry landfill site. Local residents affected by odors, pollution, or related disruption may still be able to join while the claim is active.
vs. Ministry of Defence / related administrators
This is a collective data protection claim concerning the ARAP/EGS data breach and alleged exposure of personal information. People whose details were involved may still be able to join if they fall within the affected cohort.
vs. Carnival plc
This group action concerns flight delays that disrupted package holidays between November 2023 and March 2024. Passengers affected by the disruption may still be able to join if they were part of the impacted trips and have supporting evidence.
vs. Amazon
This is a worker-status and pay-related group claim for Amazon delivery drivers and on-site managers. It may be relevant to UK individuals who worked under arrangements that potentially affected holiday pay or other employment rights.
vs. South Central Bank
This financial settlement concerns alleged overdraft fee practices. Consumers who paid qualifying overdraft fees may be able to claim a share of the fund.
vs. AT&T
Consumers affected by the AT&T data throttling matter may still be able to access refund benefits through the FTC-listed active program. This is a telecom-related consumer redress program for eligible users.
vs. Multiple vehicle manufacturers
This active group claim covers alleged vehicle emissions issues affecting consumers and vehicle owners. People who bought, leased, or financed qualifying vehicles may still be able to join if their vehicle is included in the claim.
vs. Uber
This active group claim concerns Uber drivers and their employment status, pay, and related rights. UK drivers who believe they were treated as self-employed when they should have had worker rights may still be able to join.
vs. Vonage
This open FTC refund program concerns money returned to eligible Vonage customers. Consumers who meet the program rules may still be able to receive payment.
vs. South Staffordshire PLC, South Staffs Water, Cambridge Water
This is a data breach group claim against the South Staffordshire water businesses. It is listed as active, so affected customers or account holders may still be able to join if they fall within the breached dataset.
vs. Just Eat
This claim concerns couriers working with Just Eat and is listed as active. It may allow qualifying couriers to join while the claim remains open.
vs. The Seven Motor Corp.
Job seekers who applied for a position with The Seven Motor Corp. in Washington since 2023 may qualify for a cash payment from this settlement. It covers applicants whose pay-related rights may have been violated during the hiring process.
vs. Barefoot Dreams
Consumers who purchased a product from barefootdreams.com between October 14, 2023, and June 1, 2026 may be eligible for a cash payment. The case concerns website privacy allegations tied to online purchases.
vs. Triage Staffing
People who received a notice about the Triage Staffing data breach may qualify for money and other benefits. The settlement is for individuals whose personal information may have been exposed in the breach.
vs. Oak View Group
Individuals whose information was compromised in the 2023 Oak View Group data breach may be eligible for compensation. The settlement may include reimbursement for documented losses and other cash benefits.
vs. Differin
Consumers who purchased eligible cleansers or spot treatments may receive a payment from this product settlement. The claims concern allegations that certain products were unstable and could degrade into benzene.
vs. Eureka Casino Hotel
This settlement is for individuals whose personal information was exposed in the November 2024 security breach. Claimants may receive a flat payment, reimbursement for documented losses, or identity protection services.
vs. Multiple vehicle manufacturers
This is a broad description of live UK diesel emissions group claims covering alleged defeat devices or excess NOx emissions across several manufacturers. These claims are opt-in, so affected vehicle owners must actively join the relevant action to be included.
vs. Bayer / Bayer-owned Essure manufacturer
This group litigation relates to allegations about the Essure permanent contraception device and the injuries or losses said to have followed its use. People who meet the case criteria may still be able to join if the court register remains open.
vs. Amazon
This is a UK collective claim about alleged anti-competitive marketplace conduct affecting consumers, sellers, or both depending on the case definition. People may still be able to join if the action is open and their purchases or sales fall inside the affected period.
vs. Meta Platforms
This is a collective data protection claim in the UK concerning alleged misuse of personal data under GDPR and related laws. It is a live collective action structure where affected users may still be able to participate if they fall within the class definition.
vs. Various financial firms
This category covers live UK collective claims involving alleged consumer mis-selling or unfair fees in financial products or services. If a case remains open, consumers can still join where the claim is opt-in or be represented where the tribunal has certified a class.
vs. Mastercard
This Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action concerns alleged unlawful interchange fees in the payment card market. UK consumers and businesses may be able to benefit if they fall within the certified class, although these claims are usually structured as opt-out or mixed collective proceedings rather than individual settlements.
vs. Various defendants
This category covers UK environmental group claims, including nuisance, pollution, and emissions disputes managed collectively under a group litigation order. Claimants can only take part if they join the register before it closes.
vs. Google
This is a UK collective action in the Competition Appeal Tribunal concerning app store practices and alleged overcharging or exclusionary conduct. Consumers may still be able to be included if the proceeding remains live and they fall within the affected user group.
vs. Various employers
This covers live UK group litigation over shared employment disputes such as pay, deductions, or workplace claims. It remains relevant where workers are still being admitted to a group register or collective proceeding.
vs. Apple
This collective action concerns alleged anti-competitive app store fees and rules affecting UK users and developers. It is a live collective redress case type in the CAT, so affected consumers may still be able to join or benefit depending on class status.
vs. Various manufacturers
This refers to UK collective claims over allegedly defective consumer products that caused loss or injury. These are typically opt-in claims, so the consumer must join the proceedings to be included.
vs. Flagstar Bank
Flagstar Bank agreed to settle claims tied to a data breach. Class members may be able to recover compensation for documented losses, a cash payment without proof, and free credit monitoring.
vs. Wisp
People who bought products from hellowisp.com may qualify for a cash payment under the settlement. The claim listing indicates that eligible consumers can still submit claims.
vs. Barefoot Dreams
Consumers who purchased from the Barefoot Dreams website during the class period may be eligible for a small cash payment. The settlement concerns alleged website privacy or advertising-related claims.
vs. Nissan
This is another diesel emissions GLO listed by the UK government. It allows similar claims to be handled together, and consumers with affected vehicles may still be able to join if they are within the litigation class.
vs. Old Lyme Gourmet
Consumers who bought Deep River Snacks products may qualify for settlement payments. The case concerns alleged false advertising and is listed as open to claims in the source database.
vs. Unknown
The GOV.UK GLO register lists this as an active group litigation order. The public register does not provide the full underlying facts in the snippet available here, but the case remains on the official list, meaning claimants may still be able to join through the court-approved process if eligible.
vs. Peugeot
This is a registered group action over alleged diesel emissions issues. UK consumers who own or leased affected vehicles may still be able to join if the claim has not closed to new members.
vs. Several chicken processors
Consumers who bought fresh or frozen raw chicken from qualifying processors in certain states may be eligible for a payment. The settlement expands an earlier chicken-procurement antitrust settlement and is still listed as open.
vs. Volkswagen
This group litigation concerns allegations that diesel vehicles emitted more pollution in real-world driving than allowed or advertised. Owners or lessees of eligible Volkswagen diesel vehicles may be able to participate if they are within the registered group.
vs. Citroën
This GLO concerns alleged excess diesel emissions and consumer misrepresentation claims involving Citroën vehicles. It remains on the official list of group litigation orders, so claimants may still be able to join if the litigation is still accepting members.
vs. Mastercard
This is a Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action alleging that Mastercard’s interchange fees caused losses to UK consumers and businesses. It is an opt-out style competition claim for UK-domiciled class members, so consumers may be included automatically unless they opt out, and some related claimant-finder activity has remained open at various stages of the proceedings.
vs. Mercedes-Benz
This GLO concerns diesel emissions allegations against Mercedes-Benz vehicles. Consumers with affected cars may be able to join if they meet the criteria and the claim window remains open.
vs. Various
The official UK GLO regime includes data breach and privacy cases, and the current register indicates that some matters remain active. Because the public register excerpt available here does not list a single consumer-facing data breach case with a clear open claims link, this entry reflects the active category rather than a specific named settlement.
vs. Bayer / Conceptus
This GLO concerns claims over the Essure permanent birth control device and alleged harm or inadequate warnings. It is designed for multiple similar claims to be managed together, and affected claimants may still be able to join if the litigation remains open.
vs. Ford
This group litigation involves claims over alleged diesel emissions discrepancies in Ford vehicles. Consumers with qualifying vehicles may still be able to join if they are accepted into the group claim.
vs. Jaguar Land Rover
This group action alleges issues with diesel emissions from Jaguar Land Rover vehicles. It remains on the official GLO register, so eligible claimants may still be able to join if they act through the group process.
vs. Renault
This claim concerns alleged excess diesel emissions and related consumer losses. It is a registered group litigation matter, so joining is only possible through the opt-in GLO process.
vs. FMC Health
Individuals who received a notice about the July 2022 FMC Health data breach may qualify for cash compensation and credit monitoring. The settlement is currently open for claims.
vs. Henderson & Walton Women's Center
Current and former patients affected by the breach may be able to claim cash compensation. The settlement is open for claims according to the listing.
vs. Robbie D. Wood Inc.
People whose data may have been compromised in the October 2024 breach may be eligible for a cash settlement. The settlement is open and includes possible monitoring benefits.
vs. U.S. Bank
Participants in the U.S. Bank 401(k) savings plan may be eligible for a share of the settlement fund. This is a retirement-plan settlement rather than a consumer claim, but it is listed as open.
vs. Bestway
Consumers who bought eligible spa pumps may be able to claim a refund from the settlement. The claims window remains open.
vs. Nucor
Individuals who received a data breach notice from Nucor may qualify for compensation and monitoring. The settlement remains open for claims.
vs. Hellowisp
Consumers who bought products from the Hellowisp website during the covered period may be eligible for a cash payment. The settlement is open and appears to be a low-dollar consumer refund case.
vs. Stor-a-File
This claim concerns alleged misuse or exposure of personal data held by Stor-a-File. Individuals whose information was compromised may still be able to join while the claim remains open.
vs. International Motors / Navistar
Employees or plan participants who paid a tobacco surcharge under the health plan may qualify for a cash payment. The case is listed as preliminarily approved.
vs. Various defendants
This group action concerns environmental damage and pollution impacts affecting the River Wye. People, landowners, and businesses with losses or interference caused by the alleged pollution may still be able to join.
vs. thebigword
This group claim concerns alleged issues affecting interpreters or workers connected with thebigword. People who worked under the relevant arrangements may still be able to join if they meet the claim definition.
vs. Aldi
This Competition Appeal Tribunal collective action alleges that Aldi used a fuel purchasing arrangement that reduced competition and may have led to higher prices for consumers. UK consumers who bought eligible fuel during the relevant period may be able to claim if they fall within the certified class.
vs. Microsoft
This competition collective action concerns alleged anticompetitive conduct relating to Microsoft 365 licensing. UK businesses or consumers within the certified class may still be able to join or benefit depending on the class definition and the stage of the proceedings.
vs. Multiple vehicle manufacturers
These are group litigation claims concerning alleged unlawful defeat devices and excess nitrogen oxide emissions from diesel vehicles. Owners or lessees of affected vehicles may still be able to join if their vehicle is included in the relevant claim groups.
vs. Bayer / related entities
This group claim concerns alleged harm linked to the Essure female sterilisation device. Women who had the device implanted and meet the claim criteria may still be able to join if the action remains open.
Important
This tracker is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Claim details, deadlines, and eligibility criteria may change. Always verify details on the official settlement or claim website before filing. NoReply does not process claims or collect personal data through this tool.
Over 90% of eligible people never file. Don't leave money on the table.
Lawyers file on behalf of a group of people harmed by a company's actions.
The company agrees to pay a settlement fund rather than go to full trial.
Eligible people can file a claim, usually a simple form with no lawyer needed.
After the deadline passes and claims are processed, payouts are sent by cheque or bank transfer.
A class action is a lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of people who suffered similar harm from a company. When settled, eligible people ("class members") can file a claim for compensation, often without needing a lawyer.
The UK has Group Litigation Orders (GLOs) and collective actions through the Competition Appeal Tribunal. They work similarly: a representative brings a claim on behalf of affected consumers. Some are opt-in (you must join) and some are opt-out (you're included automatically).
No. Most class action claims and UK group litigation orders can be joined without a lawyer. You simply fill out a claim form on the settlement website before the deadline.
Payouts vary wildly, from a few pounds or dollars for consumer claims, to thousands for data breaches or financial misconduct. The estimated payout shown on each claim gives you a range based on current information.
We automatically research and verify open claims on a regular basis using AI-powered legal research. Each claim shows when it was last verified. Always check the official claim website for the latest details.
Class actions aren't the only way to get your money back. NoReply helps you build a professional complaint letter that companies can't ignore.
Other places this tool comes in handy - plus the companies most likely to be on the receiving end.
This tool provides general information, not legal advice. NoReply is not a law firm and is not regulated by the SRA, BSB, FCA, or any other legal or financial regulator. Calculations, suggestions, and references to consumer law are based on AI and publicly available information and may be inaccurate, incomplete, or out of date.
You are solely responsible for verifying everything before relying on it, and for any complaint or claim you choose to pursue. For complex or high-value disputes, consult a qualified solicitor. Read the full disclaimer.
Last reviewed: by NoReply Editorial